Bill to ensure clean drinking water systems on First Nations dies with Parliament’s prorogation
Patrick White
Toronto
Published Yesterday
Updated 9 hours ago
First Nations leaders who championed a federal bill intended to address long-standing drinking water issues on reserves say the prorogation of Parliament has killed the proposed legislation and dashed hopes that Ottawa will ever tackle the problem.
“It’s dehumanizing,” said Neskantaga First Nation Chief Chris Moonias, who spent much of his Christmas holiday dealing with shortages of bottled water across the community, home to Canada’s longest-running boil-water advisory. “I supported the bill because it would set minimum standards for our First Nations drinking water so that it doesn’t fall below a certain standard. Now the whole thing is likely dead.”
Introduced in December of 2023, Bill C-61 proposed recognizing safe drinking water as a basic human right for all First Nations, setting water quality standards on reserves and helping protect the sources of water flowing onto First Nation lands.
But with the prorogation of Parliament on Monday, the fate of Bill C-61 – and 25 other government bills – appears doomed. All bills that don’t receive royal assent before prorogation are terminated and must be reintroduced after prorogation ends on March 24.
C-61 passed second reading in the House in June but its path was slowed by the opposition parties, said Indigenous Services Ministers Patty Hajdu.
“During a critical moment to do what was right, the NDP and Conservatives unfortunately blocked the bill from moving forward,” she said in a statement. “While the future of the bill is unknown, what remains certain is our work with First Nations partners to ensure clean drinking water for generations to come.”
B.C. Liberal MP Patrick Weiler, chair of the standing committee on Indigenous and Northern affairs, maintains some hope that C-61 could be reintroduced and promptly fast-tracked toward royal assent.
“There are ways, for instance through unanimous consent motions, that you could get the bill back to where it is right now,” he said in an interview. “And I would hope that would happen on something like this that is such a critical priority for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians.”
Anishinabek Nation Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige is less hopeful and says all parties share blame for C-61’s demise. She and former Assembly of First Nations national chief Phil Fontaine co-led negotiations on the bill for the AFN and she says delays began as soon as it was introduced. “The government had every opportunity to get this bill moving along before the summer, but it didn’t,” she said. “Now all this work that our leadership across the country has done for years is all for nothing. It’s absolutely frustrating and disappointing.”
Ms. Debassige said she’s been working on First Nations water issues for more than a decade, when the governing Conservatives were developing drinking water legislation that came into force in 2013 and met widespread disapproval from First Nations for failing to provide predictable funding, protect source water and consult with Indigenous groups.
In 2021, Ottawa settled a class-action lawsuit brought by Neskantaga and other First Nations over unsafe drinking water on reserves. Under the settlement the federal government agreed to provide $1.8-billion in compensation, spend $6-billion on water infrastructure and replace the Conservative law.
The Liberal government repealed the Conservative law in 2022 and agreed to co-develop a replacement law with the AFN and other groups. “The co-development made this bill a first of its kind,” said Mr. Fontaine. “But it did something else unique and unheard of by making access to clean water a human right for First Nations.”
While some First Nations leaders quibbled with aspects of the bill, leaders such as Mr. Moonias threw their weight behind it.
Now leaders are wondering if they’ll ever see First Nations water legislation return to the Order Paper.
“It’s an obligation for Canada, no matter what party is in power, to revive this bill and continue on with it,” said Ms. Debassige.
“I was in my 20s when I started this work,” she added. “Now I’m in my 40s. I’m hoping I don’t have to wait until I’m 60 to see something positive for our communities.”
Toronto
Published Yesterday
Updated 9 hours ago
First Nations leaders who championed a federal bill intended to address long-standing drinking water issues on reserves say the prorogation of Parliament has killed the proposed legislation and dashed hopes that Ottawa will ever tackle the problem.
“It’s dehumanizing,” said Neskantaga First Nation Chief Chris Moonias, who spent much of his Christmas holiday dealing with shortages of bottled water across the community, home to Canada’s longest-running boil-water advisory. “I supported the bill because it would set minimum standards for our First Nations drinking water so that it doesn’t fall below a certain standard. Now the whole thing is likely dead.”
Introduced in December of 2023, Bill C-61 proposed recognizing safe drinking water as a basic human right for all First Nations, setting water quality standards on reserves and helping protect the sources of water flowing onto First Nation lands.
But with the prorogation of Parliament on Monday, the fate of Bill C-61 – and 25 other government bills – appears doomed. All bills that don’t receive royal assent before prorogation are terminated and must be reintroduced after prorogation ends on March 24.
C-61 passed second reading in the House in June but its path was slowed by the opposition parties, said Indigenous Services Ministers Patty Hajdu.
“During a critical moment to do what was right, the NDP and Conservatives unfortunately blocked the bill from moving forward,” she said in a statement. “While the future of the bill is unknown, what remains certain is our work with First Nations partners to ensure clean drinking water for generations to come.”
B.C. Liberal MP Patrick Weiler, chair of the standing committee on Indigenous and Northern affairs, maintains some hope that C-61 could be reintroduced and promptly fast-tracked toward royal assent.
“There are ways, for instance through unanimous consent motions, that you could get the bill back to where it is right now,” he said in an interview. “And I would hope that would happen on something like this that is such a critical priority for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians.”
Anishinabek Nation Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige is less hopeful and says all parties share blame for C-61’s demise. She and former Assembly of First Nations national chief Phil Fontaine co-led negotiations on the bill for the AFN and she says delays began as soon as it was introduced. “The government had every opportunity to get this bill moving along before the summer, but it didn’t,” she said. “Now all this work that our leadership across the country has done for years is all for nothing. It’s absolutely frustrating and disappointing.”
Ms. Debassige said she’s been working on First Nations water issues for more than a decade, when the governing Conservatives were developing drinking water legislation that came into force in 2013 and met widespread disapproval from First Nations for failing to provide predictable funding, protect source water and consult with Indigenous groups.
In 2021, Ottawa settled a class-action lawsuit brought by Neskantaga and other First Nations over unsafe drinking water on reserves. Under the settlement the federal government agreed to provide $1.8-billion in compensation, spend $6-billion on water infrastructure and replace the Conservative law.
The Liberal government repealed the Conservative law in 2022 and agreed to co-develop a replacement law with the AFN and other groups. “The co-development made this bill a first of its kind,” said Mr. Fontaine. “But it did something else unique and unheard of by making access to clean water a human right for First Nations.”
While some First Nations leaders quibbled with aspects of the bill, leaders such as Mr. Moonias threw their weight behind it.
Now leaders are wondering if they’ll ever see First Nations water legislation return to the Order Paper.
“It’s an obligation for Canada, no matter what party is in power, to revive this bill and continue on with it,” said Ms. Debassige.
“I was in my 20s when I started this work,” she added. “Now I’m in my 40s. I’m hoping I don’t have to wait until I’m 60 to see something positive for our communities.”
Arson investigation into teepee torched outside Lac La Biche RCMP detachment
An arson investigation is underway after flames tore through a commemorative teepee that was a gift to an Alberta RCMP detachment from a local First Nation. Mounties say members of the public alerted Lac La Biche RCMP to the fire, which was quickly doused by local fire crews and officers using fire extinguishers on Monday night.
Police say Beaver Lake Cree Nation gifted the teepee in 2021 to symbolize reconciliation between RCMP and Indigenous Peoples.
The structure was hand-painted by Beaver Lake members and included the handprints of students from a local school.
RCMP say evidence has been secured at the scene and an investigation is ongoing.
Mounties are asking people to come forward if they have any information about the fire.
Those with information are asked to contact the Lac La Biche RCMP at 780-404-2500.
If you wish to remain anonymous, you can contact Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 (TIPS) or online.
Lac La Biche is about 200 kilometres northeast of Edmonton.
Police say Beaver Lake Cree Nation gifted the teepee in 2021 to symbolize reconciliation between RCMP and Indigenous Peoples.
The structure was hand-painted by Beaver Lake members and included the handprints of students from a local school.
RCMP say evidence has been secured at the scene and an investigation is ongoing.
Mounties are asking people to come forward if they have any information about the fire.
Those with information are asked to contact the Lac La Biche RCMP at 780-404-2500.
If you wish to remain anonymous, you can contact Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 (TIPS) or online.
Lac La Biche is about 200 kilometres northeast of Edmonton.
|
CTV News Edmonton photo
|
Tiger salamanders make mass appearance in Edmonton Area
Salamanders breed in the spring and lay their eggs in local bodies of water. Once hatched, the legless larvae, similar to a tadpole, feed on invertebrates like mosquito and other insect larvae. In August they emerge transformed into four-legged terrestrial replicas of their parents.
Despite tiger salamanders being one of the province's most common amphibians, and one of the largest salamander species in North America, they're rare to see. It was impossible for Chelsea Brown not to notice them after a large number appeared in mid-August.
"In the lawn, in our rock garden, the neighbour's driveway, across the street, crossing the street, hanging out at the corner, all along the sidewalk going down to the lake here behind me. It was absolutely crazy." The invasion lasted around two days in full force, with numbers dwindling to almost nothing by the end of the week.
It's this time of year when salamanders are most likely to become trapped in window wells, sump pumps and buckets, according to the Edmonton and Area Land Trust. Most salamanders will leave on their own. If one does get trapped in your yard, you can gently scoop it into a bucket of water and release it near a lake or pond.
https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/craziest-thing-i-ve-ever-seen-elusive-salamanders-make-surprising-mass-appearance-in-edmonton-area-1.7038920
Despite tiger salamanders being one of the province's most common amphibians, and one of the largest salamander species in North America, they're rare to see. It was impossible for Chelsea Brown not to notice them after a large number appeared in mid-August.
"In the lawn, in our rock garden, the neighbour's driveway, across the street, crossing the street, hanging out at the corner, all along the sidewalk going down to the lake here behind me. It was absolutely crazy." The invasion lasted around two days in full force, with numbers dwindling to almost nothing by the end of the week.
It's this time of year when salamanders are most likely to become trapped in window wells, sump pumps and buckets, according to the Edmonton and Area Land Trust. Most salamanders will leave on their own. If one does get trapped in your yard, you can gently scoop it into a bucket of water and release it near a lake or pond.
https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/craziest-thing-i-ve-ever-seen-elusive-salamanders-make-surprising-mass-appearance-in-edmonton-area-1.7038920
Motorists east of Edmonton told to look out for snakesHil Reine photo
Alberta Parks has issued an advisory for Cooking Lake-Blackfoot Provincial Recreation Area and Miquelon Lake Provincial Park, east and southeast of Edmonton, respectively, due to garter snakes on the roadways. “Please watch for and avoid the garter snakes on our roadways. Due to migrating back to their local hibernacula, snakes will be crossing and stopping on roads more often during the fall season,” the advisory stated. If you spot one or more slithering around in those areas, there’s no reason to fear them. While they may try and bite you if you pick them up, they are not poisonous and have tiny teeth that probably won’t break your skin. https://dailyhive.com/edmonton/garter-snakes-edmonton-alberta |
Philadelphia fleabane supposedly can repel fleas.Erigeron philadelphicus or Philadelphia fleabane is a native, somewhat weedy, perennial herb. Cows graze this plant for forage and deer use this plant for food. Butterflies, bees and moths pollinate the flowers. The plant will grow in a variety of soils; however, it requires soils that are moist and moderately well drained. It grows best in full sun but will tolerate dappled shade.
The genus name, Erigeron stems from the Greek eri, "early" and geron "old man," probably because of the plant’s hairy appearance. The common name fleabane is from Old English and it refers to the plant’s odor, which supposedly can repel fleas. Indigenous people used Philadelphia fleabane for a variety of medicinal purposes including epilepsy. A poultice was made from the plant to treat headaches. The roots were either made into tea or chewed to treat colds and coughs. The smoke from incense made from the plant was inhaled to treat head colds. It was mixed with other herbs to also treat headaches and inflammation of the nose and throat. The tea was used to break fevers. The plant was boiled and mixed with tallow to make a balm that could be spread upon sores on the skin. It was used as an eye medicine to treat dimness of sight, as an astringent, a diuretic, and as an aid for kidneys or the gout. https://plants.usda.gov/DocumentLibrary/plantguide/pdf/cs_erph.pdf 
|
As CMA prepares to apologize, a Cree doctor says racism persists in health system
Nahiyaw Physician James Makokis from Saddle Lake Cree Nation in Alberta. Photo: APTN file.
A Cree doctor who was integral in having the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) publicly apologize for its role in the past and ongoing harms to First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples says racism persists.
The apology, due Wednesday, comes thanks to a push by Indigenous doctors following the death of Joyce Echaquan. The Atikamekw mother of seven live-streamed the racist insults that health-care workers subjected her to before she died in a Que. hospital on Sept. 30, 2020
A coroner’s inquest into Echaquan’s death found that racism and prejudice were contributing factors. She died of pulmonary edema shortly after recording the video.
Dr. James Makokis told APTN News it was then that a national dialogue began on anti-Indigenous racism in the health system. Makokis is Nahiyaw from Saddle Lake Cree Nation and served on the first Indigenous Wisdom Circle set up by the CMA following Echaquan’s death.
Makokis says it’s key for the various medical regulatory bodies across the country, including the CMA to recognize their role in the ongoing harms to Indigenous people, including sterilization of women.
“We know that up until 2015 in the Saskatoon Health Authority, that was happening, and that still continues to happen to Indigenous women who undergo sterilization procedures without their consent,” Makokis says. “That continues to happen, which means that in spite of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, in spite of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, in spite of all of these national investigations into why our health is so poor-which again is rooted in colonial violence and colonization, that the medical system has been very complicit in genocide, not only in the sterilization of women, but the experimentation on Indigenous children in residential school.”
Read more CMA apology first step, but racism still persists says Cree doctor (aptnnews.ca)
The apology, due Wednesday, comes thanks to a push by Indigenous doctors following the death of Joyce Echaquan. The Atikamekw mother of seven live-streamed the racist insults that health-care workers subjected her to before she died in a Que. hospital on Sept. 30, 2020
A coroner’s inquest into Echaquan’s death found that racism and prejudice were contributing factors. She died of pulmonary edema shortly after recording the video.
Dr. James Makokis told APTN News it was then that a national dialogue began on anti-Indigenous racism in the health system. Makokis is Nahiyaw from Saddle Lake Cree Nation and served on the first Indigenous Wisdom Circle set up by the CMA following Echaquan’s death.
Makokis says it’s key for the various medical regulatory bodies across the country, including the CMA to recognize their role in the ongoing harms to Indigenous people, including sterilization of women.
“We know that up until 2015 in the Saskatoon Health Authority, that was happening, and that still continues to happen to Indigenous women who undergo sterilization procedures without their consent,” Makokis says. “That continues to happen, which means that in spite of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, in spite of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, in spite of all of these national investigations into why our health is so poor-which again is rooted in colonial violence and colonization, that the medical system has been very complicit in genocide, not only in the sterilization of women, but the experimentation on Indigenous children in residential school.”
Read more CMA apology first step, but racism still persists says Cree doctor (aptnnews.ca)
NEWS
The Missing Indigenous Wealth Transfer
Canada should not be ignoring those left out of the greatest intergenerational wealth redistribution in history
Intergenerational economic trauma is a real thing, defining and restricting the personal futures of many Indigenous peoples and low-income Canadians. Because this country truly believes that it creates a rough equality of opportunity, we have far too little discussion of entrenched inequality, particularly when it has a racial or ethnic connection.
Consider two disparate patterns working out in Canada at present. First, middle- and upper-class Canadians are part of the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in human history, as baby boomers pass on the homes, savings, and stocks to their children and grandchildren.
At the same time, extremely few Indigenous peoples have any opportunity to participate in these family wealth-building and wealth-sharing exercises, deepening the financial gap between Indigenous peoples and Canadians. Few can leverage the value of holdings on reserve to advance themselves economically.
Poverty is such an entrenched feature of Indigenous life in Canada — itself a creation of deliberate government policy, long-term discrimination, and historical marginalization — that the implications are seldom examined. Indigenous communities in rural and remote areas were long barred by geography from meaningful economic opportunity. Even if they went to residential school or relocated to a major town or city, few Indigenous peoples found prosperity.
The Indian Act imposed even more constraints. When non-Indigenous peoples, including newcomers, were owning farms, starting businesses or joining the professions and establishing a foundation of generational wealth, Indigenous peoples could not start a business, establish a big game guiding operation, own property, attend university, become a doctor, practise law, get a personal loan, or otherwise participate in the broader Canadian economy.
The financial foundations for thousands of people in 21st century Canada were set many decades ago, pursuing economic avenues from which Indigenous peoples were legally or practically barred.
If First Nations members remained on reserve, they could occupy a house, typically built by the government of Canada, and they might even be able to own the building. But the land was owned by the federal government, held in trust for the First Nation. They could not borrow against the value of the land or hope to get a competitive return for their house when sold.
Given that real estate is the primary means families can build wealth in Canada, the exclusion of First Nations and most rural and remote Indigenous peoples from the private real estate market had major multi-generational implications.
Recall, too, that the government of Canada managed an enfranchisement process, in which First Nations could be removed from the band rolls and granted full, as in non-Indigenous, Canadian citizenship. Although the system was used only a small number of times, the policy reflects the reality that official government policy assumed that wealthy or economically independent Indigenous peoples would not remain on the First Nations membership rolls.
In the eyes of the government of Canada, to be Indigenous was, almost automatically, to be poor. For generations, and even now to this day, most Indigenous political leaders did not have formal pensions, relying on their savings to get through their retirement years.
Conditions have changed, although opportunities to build personal wealth through on-reserve property investment remain limited. There are more professional and business people than there were 50 years ago. Canada is not yet fully ready for rich First Nations, Metis and Inuit peoples, but there are a growing number of genuinely wealthy Indigenous people in this country.
More money is coming into Indigenous hands, primarily from compensation agreements, legal settlements, and the remarkable expansion of collective capitalism, particularly through Indigenous economic development corporations.
It is not known how this money, like residential school payments to former students, is working its way through personal and family accounts. It is clear that, despite the multibillion-dollar price tags for some of the settlements, as in the Robinson Treaties agreements, whole communities are being denied the benefits from regional economic development.
The multi-generational challenges facing Indigenous peoples are not unique. There is a large group of people — much larger than most Canadians admit — who share a similar economic fate of Indigenous peoples, barred by political alienation, regulatory restrictions, and economics from a decent chance at the great intergenerational wealth transfer.
Many non-Indigenous residents in rural parts of the country, such as Atlantic Canada, have few opportunities to build family wealth. As well, new Canadians who arrived without wealth or advanced education (or whose credentials are not recognized) often struggle to find their feet economically.
Some escape the lead shoes of family poverty through exceptional hard work and family sacrifice, entrepreneurship, luck or the good fortune of purchasing a house in Toronto or Vancouver before housing prices skyrocketed.
Of course, these folks have not been forced to live under the continuing constraints of the Indian Act or the decades-long weight of federal paternalism directed at Indigenous peoples.
Despite successes, Indigenous peoples and their local economies will continue to be constrained as long as paternalistic policy is enabled. Unless the country finds a way to move, constructively, toward greater Indigenous wealth creation and widespread community prosperity in general, the current problem will simply continue in subsequent generations.
Ken Coates is a distinguished fellow and director of Indigenous affairs at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Karen Restoule is a senior fellow at Macdonald-Laurier Institute and from Dokis First Nation
Consider two disparate patterns working out in Canada at present. First, middle- and upper-class Canadians are part of the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in human history, as baby boomers pass on the homes, savings, and stocks to their children and grandchildren.
At the same time, extremely few Indigenous peoples have any opportunity to participate in these family wealth-building and wealth-sharing exercises, deepening the financial gap between Indigenous peoples and Canadians. Few can leverage the value of holdings on reserve to advance themselves economically.
Poverty is such an entrenched feature of Indigenous life in Canada — itself a creation of deliberate government policy, long-term discrimination, and historical marginalization — that the implications are seldom examined. Indigenous communities in rural and remote areas were long barred by geography from meaningful economic opportunity. Even if they went to residential school or relocated to a major town or city, few Indigenous peoples found prosperity.
The Indian Act imposed even more constraints. When non-Indigenous peoples, including newcomers, were owning farms, starting businesses or joining the professions and establishing a foundation of generational wealth, Indigenous peoples could not start a business, establish a big game guiding operation, own property, attend university, become a doctor, practise law, get a personal loan, or otherwise participate in the broader Canadian economy.
The financial foundations for thousands of people in 21st century Canada were set many decades ago, pursuing economic avenues from which Indigenous peoples were legally or practically barred.
If First Nations members remained on reserve, they could occupy a house, typically built by the government of Canada, and they might even be able to own the building. But the land was owned by the federal government, held in trust for the First Nation. They could not borrow against the value of the land or hope to get a competitive return for their house when sold.
Given that real estate is the primary means families can build wealth in Canada, the exclusion of First Nations and most rural and remote Indigenous peoples from the private real estate market had major multi-generational implications.
Recall, too, that the government of Canada managed an enfranchisement process, in which First Nations could be removed from the band rolls and granted full, as in non-Indigenous, Canadian citizenship. Although the system was used only a small number of times, the policy reflects the reality that official government policy assumed that wealthy or economically independent Indigenous peoples would not remain on the First Nations membership rolls.
In the eyes of the government of Canada, to be Indigenous was, almost automatically, to be poor. For generations, and even now to this day, most Indigenous political leaders did not have formal pensions, relying on their savings to get through their retirement years.
Conditions have changed, although opportunities to build personal wealth through on-reserve property investment remain limited. There are more professional and business people than there were 50 years ago. Canada is not yet fully ready for rich First Nations, Metis and Inuit peoples, but there are a growing number of genuinely wealthy Indigenous people in this country.
More money is coming into Indigenous hands, primarily from compensation agreements, legal settlements, and the remarkable expansion of collective capitalism, particularly through Indigenous economic development corporations.
It is not known how this money, like residential school payments to former students, is working its way through personal and family accounts. It is clear that, despite the multibillion-dollar price tags for some of the settlements, as in the Robinson Treaties agreements, whole communities are being denied the benefits from regional economic development.
The multi-generational challenges facing Indigenous peoples are not unique. There is a large group of people — much larger than most Canadians admit — who share a similar economic fate of Indigenous peoples, barred by political alienation, regulatory restrictions, and economics from a decent chance at the great intergenerational wealth transfer.
Many non-Indigenous residents in rural parts of the country, such as Atlantic Canada, have few opportunities to build family wealth. As well, new Canadians who arrived without wealth or advanced education (or whose credentials are not recognized) often struggle to find their feet economically.
Some escape the lead shoes of family poverty through exceptional hard work and family sacrifice, entrepreneurship, luck or the good fortune of purchasing a house in Toronto or Vancouver before housing prices skyrocketed.
Of course, these folks have not been forced to live under the continuing constraints of the Indian Act or the decades-long weight of federal paternalism directed at Indigenous peoples.
Despite successes, Indigenous peoples and their local economies will continue to be constrained as long as paternalistic policy is enabled. Unless the country finds a way to move, constructively, toward greater Indigenous wealth creation and widespread community prosperity in general, the current problem will simply continue in subsequent generations.
Ken Coates is a distinguished fellow and director of Indigenous affairs at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Karen Restoule is a senior fellow at Macdonald-Laurier Institute and from Dokis First Nation
|
|
|
|
Is a previously unheard-of First Nation just Canada’s latest Pretendian case?
Is a previously unheard-of First Nation just Canada’s latest Pretendian case?
Local chiefs claim Kawartha Lakes First Nation is part of a wave of cases in which people falsely claim Indigenous identity
The headquarters of the Kawartha Lakes First Nation sits off a single-lane highway 100 miles north-east of Toronto. Between signs advertising the sale of all-terrain vehicles, hand-scrawled messages on the three buildings decry government corruption.
At the centre of the lot, near signs for the “Redneck Church” and “Chief Willy’s Man Cave” stands a 26ft tipi. Alongside banners commemorating missing and murdered Indigenous women and the victims of Canada’s residential school system, Confederate flags flap gently in the wind.
To its 20 members, this is the heart of Canada’s newest First Nation. But seven local Indigenous chiefs claim it is the site of a brazen fraud that threatens to erode their hard-fought constitutional rights.
In recent years, Canada has grappled with a wave of “Pretendian” cases – in which people falsely claim Indigenous identity. Meanwhile, the use of Indigenous symbols and slogans has also grown increasingly common among the country’s far right.
Members of Kawartha Lakes First Nation argue they are exempt from laws and taxes, echoing the rhetoric of the extremist sovereign citizens movement, and the group’s emergence has raised concerns over how groups might use Indigenous identity to lay claim to land or demand concessions from local and provincial governments.
About two months ago, William Denby, the self-proclaimed “chief” of the Kawartha group began sending emails to local chiefs, municipal and provincial officials. The messages, seen by the Guardian, were often written in all caps and combined grievances and increasingly bold claims.
he headquarters of the Kawartha Lakes First Nation sits off a single-lane highway 100 miles north-east of Toronto. Between signs advertising the sale of all-terrain vehicles, hand-scrawled messages on the three buildings decry government corruption.
At the centre of the lot, near signs for the “Redneck Church” and “Chief Willy’s Man Cave” stands a 26ft tipi. Alongside banners commemorating missing and murdered Indigenous women and the victims of Canada’s residential school system, Confederate flags flap gently in the wind.
To its 20 members, this is the heart of Canada’s newest First Nation. But seven local Indigenous chiefs claim it is the site of a brazen fraud that threatens to erode their hard-fought constitutional rights.
In recent years, Canada has grappled with a wave of “Pretendian” cases – in which people falsely claim Indigenous identity. Meanwhile, the use of Indigenous symbols and slogans has also grown increasingly common among the country’s far right.
Members of Kawartha Lakes First Nation argue they are exempt from laws and taxes, echoing the rhetoric of the extremist sovereign citizens movement, and the group’s emergence has raised concerns over how groups might use Indigenous identity to lay claim to land or demand concessions from local and provincial governments.
About two months ago, William Denby, the self-proclaimed “chief” of the Kawartha group began sending emails to local chiefs, municipal and provincial officials. The messages, seen by the Guardian, were often written in all caps and combined grievances and increasingly bold claims.
Read More Is a previously unheard-of First Nation just Canada’s latest Pretendian case? | Canada | The Guardian
At the centre of the lot, near signs for the “Redneck Church” and “Chief Willy’s Man Cave” stands a 26ft tipi. Alongside banners commemorating missing and murdered Indigenous women and the victims of Canada’s residential school system, Confederate flags flap gently in the wind.
To its 20 members, this is the heart of Canada’s newest First Nation. But seven local Indigenous chiefs claim it is the site of a brazen fraud that threatens to erode their hard-fought constitutional rights.
In recent years, Canada has grappled with a wave of “Pretendian” cases – in which people falsely claim Indigenous identity. Meanwhile, the use of Indigenous symbols and slogans has also grown increasingly common among the country’s far right.
Members of Kawartha Lakes First Nation argue they are exempt from laws and taxes, echoing the rhetoric of the extremist sovereign citizens movement, and the group’s emergence has raised concerns over how groups might use Indigenous identity to lay claim to land or demand concessions from local and provincial governments.
About two months ago, William Denby, the self-proclaimed “chief” of the Kawartha group began sending emails to local chiefs, municipal and provincial officials. The messages, seen by the Guardian, were often written in all caps and combined grievances and increasingly bold claims.
he headquarters of the Kawartha Lakes First Nation sits off a single-lane highway 100 miles north-east of Toronto. Between signs advertising the sale of all-terrain vehicles, hand-scrawled messages on the three buildings decry government corruption.
At the centre of the lot, near signs for the “Redneck Church” and “Chief Willy’s Man Cave” stands a 26ft tipi. Alongside banners commemorating missing and murdered Indigenous women and the victims of Canada’s residential school system, Confederate flags flap gently in the wind.
To its 20 members, this is the heart of Canada’s newest First Nation. But seven local Indigenous chiefs claim it is the site of a brazen fraud that threatens to erode their hard-fought constitutional rights.
In recent years, Canada has grappled with a wave of “Pretendian” cases – in which people falsely claim Indigenous identity. Meanwhile, the use of Indigenous symbols and slogans has also grown increasingly common among the country’s far right.
Members of Kawartha Lakes First Nation argue they are exempt from laws and taxes, echoing the rhetoric of the extremist sovereign citizens movement, and the group’s emergence has raised concerns over how groups might use Indigenous identity to lay claim to land or demand concessions from local and provincial governments.
About two months ago, William Denby, the self-proclaimed “chief” of the Kawartha group began sending emails to local chiefs, municipal and provincial officials. The messages, seen by the Guardian, were often written in all caps and combined grievances and increasingly bold claims.
Read More Is a previously unheard-of First Nation just Canada’s latest Pretendian case? | Canada | The Guardian
Alberta Human Rights Commission 2022-2023 Annual Report
The Alberta Human Rights Commission has released its 2022-2023 Annual Report. The annual report provides a summary of the Commission’s activities from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 and highlights the Commission’s key achievements towards advancing human rights in Alberta.
Below are some of the accomplishments you will find highlighted in the report.
In 2022-2023, the Commission:
Continued to resolve complaints effectively and efficiently and reached related goals:
This was the first full year that the new streamlined complaint management process was in effect. The streamlined complaint system uses specialized teams in intake, conciliation, and screening, while ensuring that parties have the opportunity to make their case.
For the fourth consecutive year, in 2022-23, the number of complaints closed exceeded the number of complaints accepted.
Through the work of our specialized teams, the average length of time from acceptance of a complaint until resolution, dismissal, or referral to Tribunal reduced to 515 days in 2022-23 from 538 days in 2021-2022 and 844 days in 2020-2021.
Hired a case manager to help self-represented parties navigate the Tribunal process and ensure an efficient process
Held a record number of tribunal hearings: The Tribunal held 32 tribunal hearings and published 142 written decisions on CanLII in section 26 appeals of Director decisions, interim decisions, and decisions on merits.
Began implementing our Indigenous Human Rights Strategy: This Strategy guides the Commission’s practices and initiatives with the goal of reducing barriers that Indigenous individuals and communities face. The Strategy is guided by an Indigenous Advisory Circle, made up of Indigenous individuals from all regions of the province who help support the Strategy’s implementation.
As part of the strategy, in 2022-2023, we conducted an organization wide external review to identify areas in which the Commission may be unknowingly perpetuating systemic discrimination against Indigenous Peoples through our programs, procedures, and operations.
With support from the Indigenous Advisory Circle, we began reviewing and implementing a number of the report's additional recommendations.
Moved forward on our project to rebuild the website: We conducted extensive stakeholder consultations—including 14 internal and external focus group sessions—to inform our new website, which launched in late 2023.
Launched the #AB50for50 campaign: The Commission used its 50th anniversary as an opportunity to engage Albertans human rights in action. Developed in consultation with community organizations, the #AB50for50 initiative encouraged Albertans to spend 50 minutes in 2023 expanding their knowledge and understanding of human rights.
Published the updated human rights guide, Human rights, pregnancy, and parental rights and responsibilities: The revised version reflects the 2015 and 2018 amendments to the Act, current case law, and Commission policies and guidelines.
Below are some of the accomplishments you will find highlighted in the report.
In 2022-2023, the Commission:
Continued to resolve complaints effectively and efficiently and reached related goals:
This was the first full year that the new streamlined complaint management process was in effect. The streamlined complaint system uses specialized teams in intake, conciliation, and screening, while ensuring that parties have the opportunity to make their case.
For the fourth consecutive year, in 2022-23, the number of complaints closed exceeded the number of complaints accepted.
Through the work of our specialized teams, the average length of time from acceptance of a complaint until resolution, dismissal, or referral to Tribunal reduced to 515 days in 2022-23 from 538 days in 2021-2022 and 844 days in 2020-2021.
Hired a case manager to help self-represented parties navigate the Tribunal process and ensure an efficient process
Held a record number of tribunal hearings: The Tribunal held 32 tribunal hearings and published 142 written decisions on CanLII in section 26 appeals of Director decisions, interim decisions, and decisions on merits.
Began implementing our Indigenous Human Rights Strategy: This Strategy guides the Commission’s practices and initiatives with the goal of reducing barriers that Indigenous individuals and communities face. The Strategy is guided by an Indigenous Advisory Circle, made up of Indigenous individuals from all regions of the province who help support the Strategy’s implementation.
As part of the strategy, in 2022-2023, we conducted an organization wide external review to identify areas in which the Commission may be unknowingly perpetuating systemic discrimination against Indigenous Peoples through our programs, procedures, and operations.
With support from the Indigenous Advisory Circle, we began reviewing and implementing a number of the report's additional recommendations.
Moved forward on our project to rebuild the website: We conducted extensive stakeholder consultations—including 14 internal and external focus group sessions—to inform our new website, which launched in late 2023.
Launched the #AB50for50 campaign: The Commission used its 50th anniversary as an opportunity to engage Albertans human rights in action. Developed in consultation with community organizations, the #AB50for50 initiative encouraged Albertans to spend 50 minutes in 2023 expanding their knowledge and understanding of human rights.
Published the updated human rights guide, Human rights, pregnancy, and parental rights and responsibilities: The revised version reflects the 2015 and 2018 amendments to the Act, current case law, and Commission policies and guidelines.
WHAT WAS REQUIRED TO CREATE A HISTORICAL TREATY?
March 7, 2024
By Bruce McIvor
A historical treaty between Indigenous Peoples and the Crown was created when each side intended to create legally binding obligations and their discussions were serious and dignified.
The Crown has a long history of denying the existence of historical treaties with Indigenous Peoples. With the change to the Indian Act in 1951 which removed the ban on First Nations hiring lawyers to defend their rights, Indigenous Peoples went to court to have their treaties recognized.
Their first major victory was the White and Bob British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in 1964. It confirmed the 1854 agreement between the Snuneymuxw and Governor Douglas of the Hudson’s Bay Company was a treaty and that the treaty rights still existed.
Later Supreme Court of Canada decisions further developed the law. Instead of relying on the international law of treaties, the Court developed its own principles based on a broad and liberal interpretation that wasn’t overly legalistic and considered the specific historical circumstances.
Over the objections of the Crown, the courts have confirmed the existence of various treaties including the Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1752 between the British and the Mi’kmaw (Simon, Marshall) and a one paragraph letter signed by British General Murrary in 1760 (shortly after the Battle of Quebec) guaranteeing rights to the Huron-Wendat (Sioui).
Regrettably, even when First Nations win court decisions confirming the existence of their treaties with the Crown, they continue to struggle to have the Crown respect their treaty rights, e.g. Mi’kmaw commercial fishing rights under the Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1752 (Marshall).
Read More What was required to create a historical treaty? (firstpeopleslaw.com)
By Bruce McIvor
A historical treaty between Indigenous Peoples and the Crown was created when each side intended to create legally binding obligations and their discussions were serious and dignified.
The Crown has a long history of denying the existence of historical treaties with Indigenous Peoples. With the change to the Indian Act in 1951 which removed the ban on First Nations hiring lawyers to defend their rights, Indigenous Peoples went to court to have their treaties recognized.
Their first major victory was the White and Bob British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in 1964. It confirmed the 1854 agreement between the Snuneymuxw and Governor Douglas of the Hudson’s Bay Company was a treaty and that the treaty rights still existed.
Later Supreme Court of Canada decisions further developed the law. Instead of relying on the international law of treaties, the Court developed its own principles based on a broad and liberal interpretation that wasn’t overly legalistic and considered the specific historical circumstances.
Over the objections of the Crown, the courts have confirmed the existence of various treaties including the Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1752 between the British and the Mi’kmaw (Simon, Marshall) and a one paragraph letter signed by British General Murrary in 1760 (shortly after the Battle of Quebec) guaranteeing rights to the Huron-Wendat (Sioui).
Regrettably, even when First Nations win court decisions confirming the existence of their treaties with the Crown, they continue to struggle to have the Crown respect their treaty rights, e.g. Mi’kmaw commercial fishing rights under the Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1752 (Marshall).
Read More What was required to create a historical treaty? (firstpeopleslaw.com)
'Completely discouraged': Auditor slams First Nations housing, policing failures
Auditor general Karen Hogan speaks during a news conference, Monday, February 12, 2024 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
OTTAWA — After two new reports detailing how the federal government is underperforming on First Nations housing and policing, the federal auditor general says a fundamental shift needs to occur in the government.
"Time after time, whether in housing, policing, safe drinking water or other critical areas, our audits of federal programs to support Canada's Indigenous Peoples reveal a distressing and persistent pattern of failure," Karen Hogan said at a press conference Tuesday.
"The lack of progress clearly demonstrates that the government's passive, siloed approach is ineffective, and, in fact, contradicts the spirit of true reconciliation."
The reports tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday paint a bleak picture of Ottawa's record on First Nations housing and policing.
On First Nations housing, Hogan's report found little improvement to substandard over the past two decades.
And on the expansion of the highly criticized First Nations policing program, Hogan found poor management is leaving communities underserved and funds unspent.
Read More 'Completely discouraged': Auditor slams First Nations housing, policing failures - Business in Vancouver (biv.com)
"Time after time, whether in housing, policing, safe drinking water or other critical areas, our audits of federal programs to support Canada's Indigenous Peoples reveal a distressing and persistent pattern of failure," Karen Hogan said at a press conference Tuesday.
"The lack of progress clearly demonstrates that the government's passive, siloed approach is ineffective, and, in fact, contradicts the spirit of true reconciliation."
The reports tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday paint a bleak picture of Ottawa's record on First Nations housing and policing.
On First Nations housing, Hogan's report found little improvement to substandard over the past two decades.
And on the expansion of the highly criticized First Nations policing program, Hogan found poor management is leaving communities underserved and funds unspent.
Read More 'Completely discouraged': Auditor slams First Nations housing, policing failures - Business in Vancouver (biv.com)
Treaty 6 creating a revenue sharing model for Alberta’s consideration
By Shari Narine
Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Windspeaker.com
In July, the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations will begin creating a model for discussion with the province to share revenue from natural resource development
It’s a discussion that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and her Cabinet ministers had with Treaty 6 chiefs last week just prior to the 2024-25 budget coming down, said Confederacy Grand Chief Cody Thomas.
“At the end of the day, (it’s) being at the table and coming up with solutions or creating the framework on how that revenue sharing can contribute to Indigenous and creating that model. The difference is we have a government willing to come to the table in a way we haven't seen before,” Thomas said.
That’s a sharp contrast from what the Confederacy was saying just over a year ago when Smith’s first piece of legislation as new premier was the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act. The bill went through the legislature in December 2022 after government limited debate. Alberta chiefs viewed the act as a disregard of treaty and as a way for the province to gain access to lands without restrictions.
Read More Treaty 6 creating a revenue sharing model for Alberta’s consideration - Windspeaker.com
Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Windspeaker.com
In July, the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations will begin creating a model for discussion with the province to share revenue from natural resource development
It’s a discussion that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and her Cabinet ministers had with Treaty 6 chiefs last week just prior to the 2024-25 budget coming down, said Confederacy Grand Chief Cody Thomas.
“At the end of the day, (it’s) being at the table and coming up with solutions or creating the framework on how that revenue sharing can contribute to Indigenous and creating that model. The difference is we have a government willing to come to the table in a way we haven't seen before,” Thomas said.
That’s a sharp contrast from what the Confederacy was saying just over a year ago when Smith’s first piece of legislation as new premier was the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act. The bill went through the legislature in December 2022 after government limited debate. Alberta chiefs viewed the act as a disregard of treaty and as a way for the province to gain access to lands without restrictions.
Read More Treaty 6 creating a revenue sharing model for Alberta’s consideration - Windspeaker.com
Low emissions, Indigenous-owned Cascade Power Project to boost Alberta electrical grid reliability
New 900-megawatt natural gas-fired facility to supply more than eight per cent of Alberta's power needs
By Will Gibson on February 23, 2024, 11:34 am MST
Alberta’s electrical grid is about to get a boost in reliability from a major new natural gas-fired power plant owned in part by Indigenous communities.
Next month operations are scheduled to start at the Cascade Power Project, which will have enough capacity to supply more than eight per cent of Alberta’s energy needs.
It’s good news in a province where just over one month ago an emergency alert suddenly blared on cell phones and other electronic devices warning residents to immediately reduce electricity use to avoid outages.
“Living in an energy-rich province, we sometimes take electricity for granted,” says Chana Martineau, CEO of the Alberta Indigenous Opportunities Corporation (AIOC) and member of the Frog Lake First Nation.
“Given much of the province was dealing with -40C weather at the time, that alert was a vivid reminder of the importance of having a reliable electrical grid.”
Cascade Power was the first project to receive funding through the AIOC, the provincial corporation established in 2020 to provide loan guarantees for Indigenous groups seeking partnerships in major development projects.
Read More Low emissions, Indigenous-owned Cascade Power Project to boost Alberta electrical grid reliability (canadianenergycentre.ca)
Alberta’s electrical grid is about to get a boost in reliability from a major new natural gas-fired power plant owned in part by Indigenous communities.
Next month operations are scheduled to start at the Cascade Power Project, which will have enough capacity to supply more than eight per cent of Alberta’s energy needs.
It’s good news in a province where just over one month ago an emergency alert suddenly blared on cell phones and other electronic devices warning residents to immediately reduce electricity use to avoid outages.
“Living in an energy-rich province, we sometimes take electricity for granted,” says Chana Martineau, CEO of the Alberta Indigenous Opportunities Corporation (AIOC) and member of the Frog Lake First Nation.
“Given much of the province was dealing with -40C weather at the time, that alert was a vivid reminder of the importance of having a reliable electrical grid.”
Cascade Power was the first project to receive funding through the AIOC, the provincial corporation established in 2020 to provide loan guarantees for Indigenous groups seeking partnerships in major development projects.
Read More Low emissions, Indigenous-owned Cascade Power Project to boost Alberta electrical grid reliability (canadianenergycentre.ca)
Chief Trevor John and Her Excellency the Right Honourable Mary May Simon. She was sworn in on July 26, 2021, as Canada's first Indigenous governor general. She is the 30th governor general since Confederation.
First Peoples Law Report for January 9th
In case you missed it, check out our 2023 Indigenous Rights Year in Review.
2023 Indigenous Rights Year in Review | First Peoples Law
This week’s edition includes (lack of) progress on the Calls to Action, economic reconciliation, fishing, mining and more.
You can read it on our website here.
IN THE NEWS
National news featured the Calls to Action, Métis rights, Ribbon Skirt day and mining
Calls to Action Accountability: A 2023 Status Update on Reconciliation | Yellowhead Institute
With belaboured bill recognizing Métis self-government in limbo, here's what to know | St Albert Gazette
Ribbon Skirt day a reminder there's much work to be done | Winnipeg Sun
Consulting Indigenous communities on critical minerals is key to net zero ambitions | The Globe and Mail*
Fishing rights and Indigenous identity were the top stories on the East Coast
Fishery court cases roundup: Jan. 2-5, 2024 | Ku'ku'kwes News
Indigenous faculty raise concerns about Dalhousie University's proposed identification process | CBC News
Quebec news included day schools and consultation
Class action seeks compensation for Indigenous day school survivors in Quebec | CBC News
Hydro-Quebec is touting 'economic reconciliation' | APTN News
Ontario headlines highlighted mining, economic reconciliation and policing
Ontario chiefs seek halt to online mining claim-staking | Northern Ontario Business
Tragic Death of Indigenous Woman Sparks Discussions on Policing and Indigenous Rights | NetNewsLedger
Rama First Nation takes ownership of 5 Ramara roads | Simcoe.com
For Marten Falls First Nation, economic reconciliation begins and ends in the Ring of Fire | The Globe and Mail*
Treaty rights returned to the news in Manitoba
First Nations hunters aim to change provincial restrictions | Winnipeg Sun
Harvesting rights and cumulative impacts were front and centre in the North
Board recommends against proposed mining road in central Yukon | Eye on the Arctic
BC headlines included fishing, Land Back, UNDRIP and conservation
Feds must fix unfair West Coast fishing rules: House committee | Penticton Herald
First Nation appeals court decision | CIM Magazine
Marina gets new name amid transition to First Nation | Victoria Times Colonist
Canada’s Nature Agreement underscores the need for true reconciliation with Indigenous nations | The Conversation
Colville Confederated Tribes are bringing Canada lynx home | The Narwhal
FROM THE COURTS
The Yukon Supreme Court weighed in on consultation for the Kudz Ze Kayah mine project
Ross River Dena Council v Yukon (Government of), 2024 YKSC 1
Court hands partial victory to First Nations who say they weren't properly consulted over Yukon mine project | CBC News
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“You should not have to be arrested by conservation officers or have game confiscated by conservation officers for exercising your protected and inherent rights, rights that are constitutionally protected.”
- Grand Chief Garrison Settee, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak
OFF THE BOOKSHELF
"There is room on this land for all of us and there must also be, after centuries of struggle, room for justice for Indigenous peoples. That is all we ask. And we will settle for nothing less.”
- Arthur Manuel, Unsettling Canada: A National Wake-Up Call (2021)
*Article is paywalled and may require a subscription to access.
January 2024National Coaches Coaching Certification Program (NCCP) UpdatesHappy New Year! The February and March NCCP multi-sport schedule has been posted on the NCCP multi-sport calendar. Register early as these modules will fill up quickly.
The NCCP Advanced Coaching Diploma (ACD) helps Competition Development Certified or Trained coaches prepare for podium success at the Provincial, National and International Level. This one-year program allows coaches to connect and learn from experienced mentors, content experts, fellow coaches, and respected sport partners across Canada. Application deadline for the Canadian Sport Institute – Calgary cohort is January 31.
For more information on the Advanced Coaching Diploma, contact CSI – Calgary or register through the Locker.
Winter Walk Day - February 7, 2024February is almost here and that means Winter Walk Day is quickly approaching. Winter Walk Day is a great opportunity to be active and have fun with your family, friends, and colleagues. All Albertans can embrace the Winter Walk Day spirit by putting on their boots and warm clothes and enjoying a 15-minute walk or outdoor activity on Wednesday, February 7.
Remember, you do not have to wait for Winter Walk Day to be active! Any day can be an active day - just open the door and go for it. Staying active during the winter is important to maintaining a healthy lifestyle. In fact, research shows that spending time outdoors and being active benefits both mental and physical well-being.
Outdoor physical activity is a great social opportunity too. Join a group of friends, co-workers, or students, and register for 2024 Winter Walk Day with Safe Healthy Active People Everywhere (SHAPE).
Get outside and enjoy the fresh air - celebrate your mental and physical well-being by taking time for an enjoyable winter walk! Don’t forget to tag @SHAPE_Alberta and add #WinterWalkDay to your posts!
2023 Alberta Sport Recognition Awards - Nomination Deadline January 15, 2024Have you nominated a deserving athlete, team, coach, or technical official for an Alberta Sport Award yet? The deadline is right around the corner – January 15! Since 2002, the Alberta Sport Recognition Awards have been presented to honor the extraordinary athletic accomplishments of our high-performance Alberta athletes, teams, coaches, and officials.
Please go to the Alberta Sport Recognition Award webpage for a list of awards and nomination guidelines.
Major Cultural and Sport Events Grant (MCSE)Did you know the Ministry of Tourism and Sport now administers the Major Cultural and Sport Events (MCSE) grant program?
Applications and guidelines are currently under review and will be available on the SPAR website in early 2024.
For more information please go to the SPAR Website.
2026 Alberta Summer Games Community AnnouncementCongratulations to Strathcona County, chosen to host the 25th Alberta Summer Games in 2026!
The Summer Games have been a part of the sport community in Alberta for almost 50 years, bringing young athletes ages 11-16 together to compete in a variety of sports.
An $820,000 operating grant will be provided to the host society to support the 2026 event, which generated about $9 million in economic impact for the host community at the most recent Alberta Summer Games in Okotoks.
Strathcona County previously hosted the 1987 Alberta Summer Games and the 2000 Alberta Winter Games.
Please go to the Summer Games Website for more information.
ParticipACTION Community ChallengeThe Community Challenge is coming back in June 2024! Even though it is still a few months away, it is not too early to contact your municipality and spread the word so that your community has the best chance of being named Canada’s Most Active Community and winning $100,000 to support local sport and physical activity initiatives!
Community organizations are encouraged to apply for grants of up to $1,500 from January 16 to February 13. The grants can be used for staffing, training, promotion, equipment, and venue rentals. They are designed to increase sport and physical activity participation.
Everyone should have the opportunity to enjoy the mental and physical benefits of being active, including the essential feeling of inclusion and belonging to a community.
Go to the ParticipACTION website for more information.
The 2024 Alberta Winter Games - February 16-19, 2024 - Grande Prairie, AlbertaThe countdown is on for Alberta’s athletes, coaches and technical officials who will travel to Grande Prairie for the 2024 Alberta Winter Games.
Over 2,800 participants will represent eight zones from across the province in 19 different sports. The Opening Ceremonies will take place on February 16. We are excited to see who will light the Alberta Games Cauldron to start the games.
Go to the Alberta Winter Games Website for more details. Good Luck to everyone as you prepare to compete at the games!
Non Profit WebinarsThe Government of Alberta’s Community Development Unit (CDU) is offering free webinars in grant writing, board development, governance, role of the board executives, and other courses for non-profits. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel Conference (AARFP) - April 21-24, LethbridgeThe Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel (AARFP) annual conference and tradeshow will take place next Spring in Lethbridge. The theme for this year’s conference is “The Bridge to Recreation”.
The event is designed for all recreation managers, directors, operators, coordinators, supervisor, administrative assistants, and all professionals who want to strengthen our recreation community.
Registration is now open. Please go to the conference web page for more details.
The NCCP Advanced Coaching Diploma (ACD) helps Competition Development Certified or Trained coaches prepare for podium success at the Provincial, National and International Level. This one-year program allows coaches to connect and learn from experienced mentors, content experts, fellow coaches, and respected sport partners across Canada. Application deadline for the Canadian Sport Institute – Calgary cohort is January 31.
For more information on the Advanced Coaching Diploma, contact CSI – Calgary or register through the Locker.
Winter Walk Day - February 7, 2024February is almost here and that means Winter Walk Day is quickly approaching. Winter Walk Day is a great opportunity to be active and have fun with your family, friends, and colleagues. All Albertans can embrace the Winter Walk Day spirit by putting on their boots and warm clothes and enjoying a 15-minute walk or outdoor activity on Wednesday, February 7.
Remember, you do not have to wait for Winter Walk Day to be active! Any day can be an active day - just open the door and go for it. Staying active during the winter is important to maintaining a healthy lifestyle. In fact, research shows that spending time outdoors and being active benefits both mental and physical well-being.
Outdoor physical activity is a great social opportunity too. Join a group of friends, co-workers, or students, and register for 2024 Winter Walk Day with Safe Healthy Active People Everywhere (SHAPE).
Get outside and enjoy the fresh air - celebrate your mental and physical well-being by taking time for an enjoyable winter walk! Don’t forget to tag @SHAPE_Alberta and add #WinterWalkDay to your posts!
2023 Alberta Sport Recognition Awards - Nomination Deadline January 15, 2024Have you nominated a deserving athlete, team, coach, or technical official for an Alberta Sport Award yet? The deadline is right around the corner – January 15! Since 2002, the Alberta Sport Recognition Awards have been presented to honor the extraordinary athletic accomplishments of our high-performance Alberta athletes, teams, coaches, and officials.
Please go to the Alberta Sport Recognition Award webpage for a list of awards and nomination guidelines.
Major Cultural and Sport Events Grant (MCSE)Did you know the Ministry of Tourism and Sport now administers the Major Cultural and Sport Events (MCSE) grant program?
Applications and guidelines are currently under review and will be available on the SPAR website in early 2024.
For more information please go to the SPAR Website.
2026 Alberta Summer Games Community AnnouncementCongratulations to Strathcona County, chosen to host the 25th Alberta Summer Games in 2026!
The Summer Games have been a part of the sport community in Alberta for almost 50 years, bringing young athletes ages 11-16 together to compete in a variety of sports.
An $820,000 operating grant will be provided to the host society to support the 2026 event, which generated about $9 million in economic impact for the host community at the most recent Alberta Summer Games in Okotoks.
Strathcona County previously hosted the 1987 Alberta Summer Games and the 2000 Alberta Winter Games.
Please go to the Summer Games Website for more information.
ParticipACTION Community ChallengeThe Community Challenge is coming back in June 2024! Even though it is still a few months away, it is not too early to contact your municipality and spread the word so that your community has the best chance of being named Canada’s Most Active Community and winning $100,000 to support local sport and physical activity initiatives!
Community organizations are encouraged to apply for grants of up to $1,500 from January 16 to February 13. The grants can be used for staffing, training, promotion, equipment, and venue rentals. They are designed to increase sport and physical activity participation.
Everyone should have the opportunity to enjoy the mental and physical benefits of being active, including the essential feeling of inclusion and belonging to a community.
Go to the ParticipACTION website for more information.
The 2024 Alberta Winter Games - February 16-19, 2024 - Grande Prairie, AlbertaThe countdown is on for Alberta’s athletes, coaches and technical officials who will travel to Grande Prairie for the 2024 Alberta Winter Games.
Over 2,800 participants will represent eight zones from across the province in 19 different sports. The Opening Ceremonies will take place on February 16. We are excited to see who will light the Alberta Games Cauldron to start the games.
Go to the Alberta Winter Games Website for more details. Good Luck to everyone as you prepare to compete at the games!
Non Profit WebinarsThe Government of Alberta’s Community Development Unit (CDU) is offering free webinars in grant writing, board development, governance, role of the board executives, and other courses for non-profits. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
- Building Consensus (**New webinar)
- Board Development Program
- Building Strong Teams and Effective Relationships
- Connect with Donors this Giving Season - A Crowdfunding Alberta Webinar (**New webinar)
- Grant Writing 101
- Community Facility Enhancement Program (CFEP) Small - Morning and Afternoon Session
- Community Initiatives Program (CIP) Project-Based - Morning and Afternoon Session
- Community Initiatives Program (CIP) Operating Stream - Program Information
- Cultural Heritage Initiatives Program (CHIP) - Program Information
- How to Submit a CIP Operating Application Through Front Office
Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel Conference (AARFP) - April 21-24, LethbridgeThe Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel (AARFP) annual conference and tradeshow will take place next Spring in Lethbridge. The theme for this year’s conference is “The Bridge to Recreation”.
The event is designed for all recreation managers, directors, operators, coordinators, supervisor, administrative assistants, and all professionals who want to strengthen our recreation community.
Registration is now open. Please go to the conference web page for more details.
Tribal Chiefs Ventures Inc. has completed a project to better understand climate resilience in our member First Nations. This project was funded by the Government of Alberta, through the Municipal Climate Change Action Centre’s Climate Resilience Capacity Building Program. The Municipal Climate Change Action Centre (MCCAC) is a partnership of Alberta Municipalities, Rural Municipalities of Alberta, and the Government of Alberta. For questions, contact [email protected].
|
|
|
Did you know the Alberta Human Rights Commission has launched a new website? With mobile-friendly features and revised content, their new website aims to enhance the user experience and improve accessibility. New features also aim to improve the value of the website as a trusted tool for human rights education in Alberta.
Visit the new website to learn more: https://albertahumanrights.ab.ca/
Visit the new website to learn more: https://albertahumanrights.ab.ca/
Our TCV staff providing support at Lac Ste. Anne. |
Indigenous Rookie League wraps up for the season
|
|
|
The Indigenous Rookie League, supported by the Jays Care Foundation and Tribal Chiefs Ventures Inc., included six area First Nations communities. LAKELAND - The Indigenous Rookie League, supported by the Jays Care Foundation and Tribal Chiefs Ventures Inc., included six area First Nations communities.
Read More Indigenous Rookie League wraps up for the season - LakelandToday.ca
Read More Indigenous Rookie League wraps up for the season - LakelandToday.ca
'Forever chemicals' found in Canadians' blood samples: report
Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault rises during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Feb. 13. (Patrick Doyle/The Canadian Press)
Government departments propose listing the chemicals as toxic under Canadian Environmental Protection Act
Toxic "forever chemicals" are being found in the blood of Canadians — and even higher levels are being found in northern Indigenous communities — says a new report from the government of Canada.
Health Canada and Environment Canada have released a draft assessment of the science on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Both departments propose listing the human-made chemicals as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
Canadians have until mid-July to weigh in on the proposed change.
David Thurton · CBC · Posted: May 20, 2023 2:00 AM MDT
Toxic "forever chemicals" are being found in the blood of Canadians — and even higher levels are being found in northern Indigenous communities — says a new report from the government of Canada.
Health Canada and Environment Canada have released a draft assessment of the science on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Both departments propose listing the human-made chemicals as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
Canadians have until mid-July to weigh in on the proposed change.
David Thurton · CBC · Posted: May 20, 2023 2:00 AM MDT
Air Quality in Whitefish
Carbon Monoxide:
Carbon Monoxide:
The concentration of Carbon Monoxide was heavily increased in two time periods (May 02- May 05 & May 10 – May 13) and surpassed Canadian standard (50 ppm). See two green circles in the below plot.
Nitric Oxide:
The frequency of high Nitric Oxide concentration is increased from May 01 onwards, already 6 times since May 01 until today (see faint blue towers in picture below). It surpassed Canadian standard (25 ppm) once in May 14 (tallest tower in far right below).
Fine dust particles in the air (PM2.5):
The data shows continuous increase in fine dust particles in the air since April 20 and continues until today, May 19. There is no sign that values are going down. It surpassed Canadian threshold of 35 ug/m3 many times during last few weeks.
Coarse dust particles in the air (PM10):
The coarse dust particles in the air were negligible until March 24 and sharply increased after that until today (May 19) (See dark blue solid line in below picture). The concentration keeps on increasing, no sign of lowering down.
At a Glance - May 12, 2023
Wildfires Continue
Alberta declared a state of emergency this week as wildfires continue to burn. While the cooler weather offered a slight respite, allowing several thousand evacuees to return home, conditions are expected to worsen as the weather becomes hotter and drier ahead of the weekend. Temperatures are projected to be fifteen degrees above what is typical for May as Alberta enters a heat dome expected to last Friday to Tuesday. As the effort to fight the blaze continues, firefighters question budget-cuts that have left the province battling the wildfire short-handed. A former Alberta-based elite firefighter group feel that they “could have been difference-makers” had the UCP not cut the program in 2019. This week, the provincial government announced that evacuees that have been displaced for seven-days will be eligible for compensation. Eligible adults will receive a one-time payment of $1,250 and an additional $500 will be available for each dependent child under 18. For a family of four, this would amount to $3,500 total. The province also provided clarification that the seven-days need not be consecutive in order to be eligible for compensation.
Controversies of the Week
Danielle Smith has found herself embroiled in several new – and renewed – controversies this week. A resurfaced video of Danielle Smith, captures her comparing 75% of vaccinated Albertans to Nazi Supporters. Smith apologized and attributed her comments to the pandemic, citing that it was a “difficult and frustrating time for everyone.” Her apology was not well received by several groups, notably the Jewish Human Rights group - B’nai Brith Canada - and the Royal Canadian Legion. Additionally, Smith has come under fire this week for informing UCP supporters at a party event about the Alberta government’s impending announcement of a state of emergency prior to informing the public. Smith’s spokesman has so far declined to address questions over the disclosure.
Safe Streets Campaign Promise
In one of their most recent campaign promises, and days after the fatal stabbing of a mother and daughter in the Mill Woods community, the UCP has announced their plan to restore safety to city-streets and public-transit safer if re-elected. At a press conference, Smith and Mike Ellis announced several measures that will be taken in order to accomplish this, including ankle bracelets for dangerous offenders out on bail, an anti-fentanyl and anti gun trafficking teams, and increased funding to address gang-related crime and child exploitation. The UCP also announced this week that they plan to provide more funding for women’s shelters and sexual assault counselling. Regarding the UCP’s stated intention to impose ankle bracelets to monitor offenders out on bail, several experts have raised their concerns about the legality, and feasibility, of such a promise. Many have raised their concern that due to the separation of powers between the judicial system and the government, the provincial government would have no authority to enforce a promise such as this.
NDP Deny Accusations of Illegal Third-Party Advertising
The UCP addressed a letter written by the executive director of the party on May 2nd to Elections Alberta disclosing their concern that three unions have been involved in third-party advertising to benefit the Alberta NDP leader Rachel Notley as well as “colluding” with the NDP to exceed contribution and expense limits while failing to submit proper financial reports. The three unions of concern are the Federation of Labour, Canadian Union of Public Employees and Alberta Teachers Union. While all unions and the Alberta NDP have released statements dismissing the concerns raised by the UCP as baseless, it will be up to Elections Alberta to ensure there have been no compliance failures and launch an investigation if they see fit.
Sask. journalist wins Pulitzer Prize, Peabody for podcast about her father's residential school experience
|
Connie Walker and team at Spotify's Gimlet Media win best audio journalism for Stolen: Surviving St. Michael's
A Saskatchewan First Nations woman's story about her father's residential school experience has won the Pulitzer Prize and a Peabody Award in the span of 24 hours. Stolen: Surviving St. Michael's, a podcast by journalist Connie Walker and the team at Spotify's Gimlet Media, won the 2023 Pulitzer Prize on Monday for best audio journalism. The following day, it won a Peabody Award for its "its tenacious reporting and continued commitment to recognizing the full history of the Indigenous community" in the podcast and radio category. "I feel like I'm still in shock. It's disbelief. It means so much. It's an incredible honour," Walker said Monday. CBC News · Posted: May 08, 2023 5:02 PM MDT |
Journalist Connie Walker's podcast about her father's experience at a residential school in Duck Lake, Sask., has won the Pulitzer Prize for best audio journalism. (Submitted by Connie Walker)
|
This week’s edition includes Treaty rights, court cases, legal personhood, UNDRIP and more. You can read it on our website here.
IN THE NEWS
Treaty rights were front and centre on the east coast
Legal personhood was in the spotlight in Quebec
Ontario news included Treaty rights, jurisdiction and consultation
UNDRIP, Treaty rights and cannabis laws topped BC headlines
UNDRIP also featured in NWT news
FROM THE COURTS
Here’s a new case out of BC regarding possession of reserve lands
IN THE NEWS
Treaty rights were front and centre on the east coast
Legal personhood was in the spotlight in Quebec
- First Nations chiefs adopt resolution declaring St. Lawrence River a legal person | iHeartRadio
- AFN leader pitches ‘personhood’ status for St. Lawrence River | APTN News
- The Legal Personhood of the St. Lawrence River Recognized and Presented by First Nations to the UN | AFNQL
Ontario news included Treaty rights, jurisdiction and consultation
- Treaty 9 nations suing Canada, Ontario over jurisdiction | APTN News
- First Nations sue over Treaty 9, raising questions on Ring of Fire | The Narwhal
- Without First Nations’ consent mining critical minerals is cultural genocide, leader tells Ontario, Canada | Wind Speaker
- Atikameksheng Anishnawbek issues a formal response to Ontario government’s proposed Bill 71, Building More Mines Act | Anishinabek News
- Changes to Mining Act expose cracks in Ontario's duty to consult with First Nations | CBC News
UNDRIP, Treaty rights and cannabis laws topped BC headlines
- $200M UNDRIP fund will empower First Nations in B.C., Indigenous leaders say | Global News
- Local First Nations' loss of Montney Reserve ignites 20-year legal battle for justice | Energetic City
- Cannabis laws in B.C. need changing say First Nation Leaders | APTN news
- New agreements between First Nations and B.C. government a step toward fulfilling Canada's treaty obligations | The Conversation
UNDRIP also featured in NWT news
- Dehcho First Nations' support of UNDRIP legislation 'up in the air': grand chief | CKLB Radio
- UNDRIP implementation not supported by all Indigenous governments in the N.W.T. | CBC News
FROM THE COURTS
Here’s a new case out of BC regarding possession of reserve lands
Kainai Blood Tribe has a drug problem ‘with no antidote’ says doctor
|
A physician on the Kainai Blood Tribe in southern Alberta says the community has a drug problem is killing people and has no antidote.
“Xylazine will be a problem across the province and people are dying within ten minutes of taking it,” says Dr. Esther Tailfeathers. Tailfeathers says the number of young people dying from it are chilling. Kainai Blood Tribe in throes of Xylazine Fentanyl epidemic (aptnnews.ca) |
|
Today, Statistics Canada released "Study: Housing experiences and well-being among First Nations people living off reserve, Métis and Inuit, 2018".
Housing experiences and measures of health and well-being among First Nations people living off reserve, Métis and Inuit: Findings from the 2018 Canadian Housing Survey (statcan.gc.ca)
As a key social determinant of health, housing tenure and conditions can have profound impacts on well-being. Indigenous people are disproportionately affected by inadequate, unaffordable, and unsuitable housing as findings from a newly released study on housing experiences and well-being indicate.
Using the 2018 Canadian Housing Survey, a unique dataset that combines housing and well-being indicators, this study examines previously explored housing measures (e.g., living in crowded dwellings or those in need of major repairs) in addition to new ones in relation to health, life satisfaction, and financial hardship offering a more fulsome picture of housing and well-being among Indigenous people. Given the nature of the survey's data collection, the findings of this study are reflective of responses obtained from Indigenous housing decision-makers aged 15 and older (known as reference persons) within their household with estimates presented for Indigenous households and people within those households where relevant. Findings exclude people living on reserve.
ISCDI Training:
The Indigenous Statistical Capacity Development Initiative (ISCDI) is offering the training sessions. See calendar below.
As a key social determinant of health, housing tenure and conditions can have profound impacts on well-being. Indigenous people are disproportionately affected by inadequate, unaffordable, and unsuitable housing as findings from a newly released study on housing experiences and well-being indicate.
Using the 2018 Canadian Housing Survey, a unique dataset that combines housing and well-being indicators, this study examines previously explored housing measures (e.g., living in crowded dwellings or those in need of major repairs) in addition to new ones in relation to health, life satisfaction, and financial hardship offering a more fulsome picture of housing and well-being among Indigenous people. Given the nature of the survey's data collection, the findings of this study are reflective of responses obtained from Indigenous housing decision-makers aged 15 and older (known as reference persons) within their household with estimates presented for Indigenous households and people within those households where relevant. Findings exclude people living on reserve.
ISCDI Training:
The Indigenous Statistical Capacity Development Initiative (ISCDI) is offering the training sessions. See calendar below.
Date |
Workshop |
April 25-26, 2023 1:00-3:30pm (ET) |
Using Indigenous data from the 2021 Census (2 half-day course offered in English) Conducted every five years, the Census of Population is the most comprehensive source of data on the demographic, social and economic characteristics of Canadians. This course will explore the 2021 Census of Population data available and enhance participants’ ability to use data to support their community and organization’s needs. This course will provide participants with a basic understanding of the methodology and processes involved in conducting the census, and will explore census geographies, universes and variables used within the census with a focus on the Indigenous population. This course will also demonstrate how to use Census Program website tools and how to find and use census data on the Statistics Canada Website. |
May 2-3, 2023 1:00-3:00pm (ET) |
Introduction to Statistics (2 half-day course offered in English) This course will provide participants with a basic understanding of statistics, including key statistical concepts, how data can be interpreted using statistics, and how statistics can help to understand a particular topic of interest. The course will also discuss how descriptive statistics, including averages and distributions are calculated and interpreted |
May 4, 2023 1:00-2:30pm (ET) |
Navigating the Statistics Canada Website (offered in English) This course is an introduction to the Statistics Canada website. The course will guide participants through the main sections of the website, focusing on how to access Indigenous statistics as well as how to find key indicators, community-level data, and census data products. |
May 9-10, 2023 1:00-2:30pm (ET) |
Preparing Funding Proposals (2 half-day course offered in English) This course will discuss different components of funding proposals, including developing an idea into a plan, identifying potential funding opportunities, finding the data needed to support the proposal, and how to write the proposal using the data identified. |
May 16-18, 2023 1:00-3:00pm (ET) |
Surveys from Start to Finish (3 half-day course offered in English) This course will provide participants with the basic knowledge needed to understand and evaluate surveys by walking through the steps of the survey process. Topics include questionnaire design, data collection methods, working with the data collected and communicating the results in an accessible way. |
June 1, 2023 1:00-2:30pm (ET) |
Navigating the Statistics Canada Website (offered in French) This course is an introduction to the Statistics Canada website. The course will guide participants through the main sections of the website, focusing on how to access Indigenous statistics as well as how to find key indicators, community-level data, and census data products. |
June 14-15, 2023 1:00-3:00pm (ET) |
Preparing Funding Proposals (2 half-day course offered in French) This course will discuss different components of funding proposals, including developing an idea into a plan, identifying potential funding opportunities, finding the data needed to support the proposal, and how to write the proposal using the data identified. |
The Indigenous Statistical Capacity Development Initiative enables Indigenous organizations and communities to develop statistical capacity to increase self-determination by providing training on various topics as they relate to statistics. *Please note that the ISCDI courses are offered at no cost to Indigenous communities and members from Indigenous organizations.
To register or for more information, please email: [email protected]
To register or for more information, please email: [email protected]
|
|
|
Job opportunity at PrairiesCan
Please see below the link to the CO-02 (Senior Business Officer )
The immediate vacancy will require supporting Alberta Indigenous communities to pursue economic development projects that either increase energy efficiency in communities or increases clean energy generation.
Career Opportunity:
The following job opportunity is available in the following locations: Calgary (Alberta), Edmonton (Alberta), Fort McMurray (Alberta), Grande Prairie (Alberta), Lethbridge (Alberta). The job opportunity can be accessed with the following link:
Senior Business Officer (cfp-psc.gc.ca)
The immediate vacancy will require supporting Alberta Indigenous communities to pursue economic development projects that either increase energy efficiency in communities or increases clean energy generation.
Career Opportunity:
The following job opportunity is available in the following locations: Calgary (Alberta), Edmonton (Alberta), Fort McMurray (Alberta), Grande Prairie (Alberta), Lethbridge (Alberta). The job opportunity can be accessed with the following link:
Senior Business Officer (cfp-psc.gc.ca)
|
Empowering Indigenous Learners CPAWSB and AFOA Alberta Collaborate on Tailored CPA Certification Program OfferingsWe're excited to share that the CPA Western School of Business (CPAWSB) and the Aboriginal Financial Officers Association of Alberta (AFOA) have joined forces to create two courses for Indigenous learners. These courses are based on the regular CPA certification program but will be tailored to meet the unique preferences and expectations of Indigenous learners and incorporate Indigenous culture and context in the program.
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Fine Justice Writer
Indigenous communities are in court seeking billions of dollars in compensation after almost 150 years of receiving small annual payments in return for ceding an area the size of France. But the Ontario government is arguing they are owed nothing, or at most $34-million.
The wide divergence in claims was on display this week in an unprecedented court hearing in Sudbury, Ont., whose purpose is to determine how much the Crown owes for breaking a treaty promise to share wealth produced by the natural resources of a vast area in Northern Ontario.
A lawyer for several Anishinaabe communities collectively made up of about 15,000 people told Ontario Superior Court Justice Patricia Hennessy on Monday that they are owed at least $8-billion, and perhaps as much as $100-billion.
In 1850, Anishinaabe leaders signed two treaties with the Crown that gave over control of resource-rich lands stretching from the north shores of Lake Superior and Lake Huron to Hudson Bay, which today includes the communities of Thunder Bay, Sault Ste. Marie, Sudbury and North Bay.
But the Crown, after paying an initial lump sum of a few thousand dollars, has been making annuity payments capped at just $4 a person since 1875.
Justice Hennessy will be devising a revenue-sharing plan to compensate for the past resource wealth generated on these treaty lands. It will be the first such court-ordered plan in Canada, and it will have enormous practical consequences for thousands of Anishinaabe people in Northern Ontario, who courts have said were left impoverished by the Crown’s neglect of its treaty promise.
Five years ago, Justice Hennessey ruled that the Crown had broken a pledge, set out in two 1850 treaties, to augment the annuity payments as Crown resource revenues permitted. In 2021, the Ontario Court of Appeal largely upheld her ruling.
The judge now has a monumental task: she must determine what revenues to count, what expenses to subtract from those revenues, what interest rate should apply to reflect growth over time and what share of the net revenues should be paid to the First Nations involved.
And on top of all that, she needs to decide which level of government – federal, or provincial – is on the hook for the money owed. On Tuesday, federal lawyer Glynis Evans told Justice Hennessy the vast majority is owed by Ontario. On Wednesday, Ontario’s lawyer, Tamara Barclay, said all of it is owed by the federal government. She added that Supreme Court rulings of the late 19th century had resolved the issue.
But the complications do not end there. Even as four months of hearings got under way this week in a large, makeshift courtroom in Sudbury, the province is still appealing the Ontario Court of Appeal’s earlier ruling on whether the Crown actually did break its treaty promise to share the wealth. That case is pending at the Supreme Court of Canada.
If the Supreme Court overturns that ruling, the entire exercise in Sudbury would be for naught. But given that the First Nations’ lawsuit over the treaty promise began in 1999, and that Anishinaabe elders knowledgeable in oral history and cultural matters are not getting any younger, the Supreme Court rejected Ontario’s request for a stay of the compensation hearings. So did Justice Hennessy.
The First Nations who are parties to the case have shifted. The Red Rock and Whitesand First Nations, who are part of the Robinson-Superior Treaty, have been joined by three other First Nations. Another seven First Nations say they never gave over title to their lands and are trying to win court recognition of that claim (though not as part of the current case). They are represented at the hearings in case they do not ultimately establish that they have title.
Another 21 First Nations are part of the Robinson-Huron Treaty, a territory also addressed by the initial court rulings. This group is now in negotiations with the two levels of government. Their compensation hearing has been adjourned indefinitely.
Harley Schachter, a lawyer representing Red Rock, Whitesand and three other First Nations, likened Ontario’s position that governments owe virtually nothing to that of a fox left in charge of the chickens.
“The fox turns to the judge – got egg all over his face – and in the most reassuring manner and calm tone he can muster says, ‘Look, judge, firstly, about the eggs, there are none, so I don’t know why the chickens are complaining,’” he told Justice Hennessy on Monday, the first day of the hearings.
His clients are claiming an 84-per-cent share of net Crown revenues in five areas, including mining and forestry. The 84 per cent is based on the share of economic risk the First Nations say they took on in the joint venture represented by the treaty.
The higher estimates in the tens of billions of dollars reflect not just what the Crown recouped in various fees, but the higher fees it could have charged if its aim had been to collect on their full value. (Mr. Schachter called this approach “economic rents.”)
On Friday, two-time Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz, an economist, will testify in support of that approach.
“Yes, the final amounts claimed as payable are large,” Mr. Schachter told Justice Hennessy. “They are large because the Crowns did not honour the treaty obligation. They are large but they are not untoward.”
Ms. Barclay, representing Ontario, told Justice Hennessy the province lost $7.9-billion on resources in the territory.
That figure includes the costs of building roads and railways. An alternative approach to determining net revenues would mean $34-million is owed to the Anishinaabe, she said. The First Nations argue that road and railway costs are part of nation-building and should not be deducted from revenues.
Ms. Evans, representing the federal government, said Tuesday the Anishinaabe’s share of net Crown revenues should be roughly 10 per cent, reflecting the ratio of Indigenous to non-Indigenous people in the Robinson-Superior treaty territory. She did not put forward a precise dollar figure, but opposed the “economic rents” approach of the First Nations.
Indigenous communities are in court seeking billions of dollars in compensation after almost 150 years of receiving small annual payments in return for ceding an area the size of France. But the Ontario government is arguing they are owed nothing, or at most $34-million.
The wide divergence in claims was on display this week in an unprecedented court hearing in Sudbury, Ont., whose purpose is to determine how much the Crown owes for breaking a treaty promise to share wealth produced by the natural resources of a vast area in Northern Ontario.
A lawyer for several Anishinaabe communities collectively made up of about 15,000 people told Ontario Superior Court Justice Patricia Hennessy on Monday that they are owed at least $8-billion, and perhaps as much as $100-billion.
In 1850, Anishinaabe leaders signed two treaties with the Crown that gave over control of resource-rich lands stretching from the north shores of Lake Superior and Lake Huron to Hudson Bay, which today includes the communities of Thunder Bay, Sault Ste. Marie, Sudbury and North Bay.
But the Crown, after paying an initial lump sum of a few thousand dollars, has been making annuity payments capped at just $4 a person since 1875.
Justice Hennessy will be devising a revenue-sharing plan to compensate for the past resource wealth generated on these treaty lands. It will be the first such court-ordered plan in Canada, and it will have enormous practical consequences for thousands of Anishinaabe people in Northern Ontario, who courts have said were left impoverished by the Crown’s neglect of its treaty promise.
Five years ago, Justice Hennessey ruled that the Crown had broken a pledge, set out in two 1850 treaties, to augment the annuity payments as Crown resource revenues permitted. In 2021, the Ontario Court of Appeal largely upheld her ruling.
The judge now has a monumental task: she must determine what revenues to count, what expenses to subtract from those revenues, what interest rate should apply to reflect growth over time and what share of the net revenues should be paid to the First Nations involved.
And on top of all that, she needs to decide which level of government – federal, or provincial – is on the hook for the money owed. On Tuesday, federal lawyer Glynis Evans told Justice Hennessy the vast majority is owed by Ontario. On Wednesday, Ontario’s lawyer, Tamara Barclay, said all of it is owed by the federal government. She added that Supreme Court rulings of the late 19th century had resolved the issue.
But the complications do not end there. Even as four months of hearings got under way this week in a large, makeshift courtroom in Sudbury, the province is still appealing the Ontario Court of Appeal’s earlier ruling on whether the Crown actually did break its treaty promise to share the wealth. That case is pending at the Supreme Court of Canada.
If the Supreme Court overturns that ruling, the entire exercise in Sudbury would be for naught. But given that the First Nations’ lawsuit over the treaty promise began in 1999, and that Anishinaabe elders knowledgeable in oral history and cultural matters are not getting any younger, the Supreme Court rejected Ontario’s request for a stay of the compensation hearings. So did Justice Hennessy.
The First Nations who are parties to the case have shifted. The Red Rock and Whitesand First Nations, who are part of the Robinson-Superior Treaty, have been joined by three other First Nations. Another seven First Nations say they never gave over title to their lands and are trying to win court recognition of that claim (though not as part of the current case). They are represented at the hearings in case they do not ultimately establish that they have title.
Another 21 First Nations are part of the Robinson-Huron Treaty, a territory also addressed by the initial court rulings. This group is now in negotiations with the two levels of government. Their compensation hearing has been adjourned indefinitely.
Harley Schachter, a lawyer representing Red Rock, Whitesand and three other First Nations, likened Ontario’s position that governments owe virtually nothing to that of a fox left in charge of the chickens.
“The fox turns to the judge – got egg all over his face – and in the most reassuring manner and calm tone he can muster says, ‘Look, judge, firstly, about the eggs, there are none, so I don’t know why the chickens are complaining,’” he told Justice Hennessy on Monday, the first day of the hearings.
His clients are claiming an 84-per-cent share of net Crown revenues in five areas, including mining and forestry. The 84 per cent is based on the share of economic risk the First Nations say they took on in the joint venture represented by the treaty.
The higher estimates in the tens of billions of dollars reflect not just what the Crown recouped in various fees, but the higher fees it could have charged if its aim had been to collect on their full value. (Mr. Schachter called this approach “economic rents.”)
On Friday, two-time Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz, an economist, will testify in support of that approach.
“Yes, the final amounts claimed as payable are large,” Mr. Schachter told Justice Hennessy. “They are large because the Crowns did not honour the treaty obligation. They are large but they are not untoward.”
Ms. Barclay, representing Ontario, told Justice Hennessy the province lost $7.9-billion on resources in the territory.
That figure includes the costs of building roads and railways. An alternative approach to determining net revenues would mean $34-million is owed to the Anishinaabe, she said. The First Nations argue that road and railway costs are part of nation-building and should not be deducted from revenues.
Ms. Evans, representing the federal government, said Tuesday the Anishinaabe’s share of net Crown revenues should be roughly 10 per cent, reflecting the ratio of Indigenous to non-Indigenous people in the Robinson-Superior treaty territory. She did not put forward a precise dollar figure, but opposed the “economic rents” approach of the First Nations.
|
|
|
|
Indigenous Hunting Rights and the NRTA: Case Comment on R. v. Green
|
By Kate Gunn and Nisha Sikka
The question of when and under what circumstances Indigenous people can hunt for food and cultural purposes outside of their province of residence has been a longstanding source of tension and uncertainty, particularly in Canada’s prairie provinces. In its recent decision in R. v. Green, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal highlighted the lack of clarity in the law on this issue. Below, we consider the implications of the decision for Indigenous hunting rights across Canada. |
|
Hunting, Treaties and the Natural Resources Transfer Agreements
In the decades leading up to and following Confederation, the Crown entered into a series of treaties with Indigenous Peoples across most of western Canada, including in the region now known as Saskatchewan. The written English versions of most of the treaties provide that the Indigenous treaty parties have the right to continue to hunt on lands throughout the treaty territory until such lands are "taken up" by the Crown for purposes such as non-Indigenous settlement and resource exploitation.
In the 1930s, Canada entered into a series of agreements (the Natural Resources Transfer Agreements, or NRTAs) which transferred the administration and control of Crown lands and resources from the federal to the provincial governments in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Paragraph 12 of the Saskatchewan NRTA affirms that Indigenous Peoples in the province possess a right to hunt, trap and fish on all unoccupied Crown lands or on any other lands which they have a right to access. The Alberta and Manitoba NRTAs contain similar provisions.
Today, treaty hunting rights are recognized and protected pursuant to section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. Courts have further held that the NRTAs are constitutional documents which must be interpreted in light of the Crown’s relationship with and obligations to Indigenous Peoples. For further background on treaties and the NRTAs, see our previous blog post on the Green decision.
The Green Litigation
In 2018 Blair Hill and Albert Green, both from the Six Nations First Nation in Ontario, were charged with unlawful hunting in a provincial park in Saskatchewan.
The trial judge held that Mr. Hill and Mr. Green should be acquitted of the charges because they were exercising a constitutionally protected right to hunt under paragraph 12 of the Saskatchewan NRTA, notwithstanding the fact that both men resided outside the province.
On appeal at the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench, the Court reversed the trial decision and held that paragraph 12 of the NRTA applies only to Indigenous people who hold rights under the numbered treaties which apply to lands within Saskatchewan. Mr. Hill and Mr. Green appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
What the Court Said
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the convictions of Mr. Hill and Mr. Green.
The Court held that the question of whether the NRTA provides that all Indigenous people have a right to hunt on unoccupied lands in Saskatchewan, regardless of their province of residence, is an important constitutional issue that will affect Indigenous people residing within and outside the province.
However, the Court held that it was unable to determine the issue based on the evidentiary record before it and ordered that a trial be held with additional historical evidence regarding the negotiation and purpose of the NRTA.
Why It Matters
The Court of Appeal decision affirms that the question of whether the hunting rights set out in the NRTA apply to all Indigenous people, or only those who hold rights under numbered treaties in Saskatchewan, is an issue of significant public importance which must be clarified by the courts.
Rather than resolving the issue, the decision in Green leaves Indigenous people seeking to hunt outside their province of residence in a legal grey area. The ongoing lack of clarity in the law has the potential to foment further uncertainty and conflict regarding Indigenous Peoples’ right to hunt, particularly in provinces which are already grappling with the effects of racism and the Crown’s ongoing failure to honour and uphold its treaty promises.
At the same time, the decision also opens the door for a more robust interpretation of Indigenous hunting rights which takes into account the historical and cultural circumstances which underlie the issues in the litigation. As the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed, constitutional issues cannot be determined in a vacuum. Based on the direction of the Court of Appeal, the eventual second trial decision in Green could result in a more meaningful understanding of Indigenous Peoples’ rights based on a full evidentiary record.
Looking Ahead
Too often, the rights of Indigenous Peoples have been determined by Canadian courts in the absence of a proper understanding of both the underlying historical facts and the perspectives of the Indigenous Peoples whose rights are at issue.
In some jurisdictions there are signs that this approach is shifting. In recent litigation in Ontario, for example, the Court heard extensive historical evidence as well as evidence from both Anishinaabe and Euro-Canadian witnesses, including experts, Elders and Chiefs, regarding the Crown’s obligations to increase annuity payments to the Indigenous beneficiaries of the Robinson Huron and Robinson Superior Treaties. The Court emphasized that the evidence of the Anishinaabe and Euro-Canadian perspectives were to be treated equally, and that evidence regarding the treaty parties’ understandings and intentions would not be discounted merely because it came from an unconventional source.
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Green suggests a similar shift may be at least partially underway in Saskatchewan. On the one hand, the Court’s emphasis on the need for historical evidence is an important step towards ensuring the interpretation of the NRTA is informed by the historical circumstances in which it was negotiated. At the same time, however, the Court fails to highlight the importance of including evidence regarding Indigenous Peoples’ understandings of the rights guaranteed pursuant to the numbered treaties and affirmed by the NRTA.
As a result, there is still a risk that the issues in Green will be decided without adequate consideration of the Indigenous perspective.
Going forward, it will be for both the parties and the trial judge to ensure that such evidence is included and given weight if the Green litigation is to both clarify the law and advance reconciliation.
First Peoples Law LLP is a law firm dedicated to defending and advancing the rights of Indigenous Peoples. We work exclusively with Indigenous Peoples to defend their inherent and constitutionally protected title, rights and Treaty rights, uphold their Indigenous laws and governance and ensure economic prosperity for their current and future generations.
Chat with us
Kate Gunn is partner at First Peoples Law LLP. Kate completed her Master's of Law at the University of British Columbia. Her most recent academic essay, "Agreeing to Share: Treaty 3, History & the Courts," was published in the UBC Law Review.
In the decades leading up to and following Confederation, the Crown entered into a series of treaties with Indigenous Peoples across most of western Canada, including in the region now known as Saskatchewan. The written English versions of most of the treaties provide that the Indigenous treaty parties have the right to continue to hunt on lands throughout the treaty territory until such lands are "taken up" by the Crown for purposes such as non-Indigenous settlement and resource exploitation.
In the 1930s, Canada entered into a series of agreements (the Natural Resources Transfer Agreements, or NRTAs) which transferred the administration and control of Crown lands and resources from the federal to the provincial governments in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Paragraph 12 of the Saskatchewan NRTA affirms that Indigenous Peoples in the province possess a right to hunt, trap and fish on all unoccupied Crown lands or on any other lands which they have a right to access. The Alberta and Manitoba NRTAs contain similar provisions.
Today, treaty hunting rights are recognized and protected pursuant to section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. Courts have further held that the NRTAs are constitutional documents which must be interpreted in light of the Crown’s relationship with and obligations to Indigenous Peoples. For further background on treaties and the NRTAs, see our previous blog post on the Green decision.
The Green Litigation
In 2018 Blair Hill and Albert Green, both from the Six Nations First Nation in Ontario, were charged with unlawful hunting in a provincial park in Saskatchewan.
The trial judge held that Mr. Hill and Mr. Green should be acquitted of the charges because they were exercising a constitutionally protected right to hunt under paragraph 12 of the Saskatchewan NRTA, notwithstanding the fact that both men resided outside the province.
On appeal at the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench, the Court reversed the trial decision and held that paragraph 12 of the NRTA applies only to Indigenous people who hold rights under the numbered treaties which apply to lands within Saskatchewan. Mr. Hill and Mr. Green appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
What the Court Said
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the convictions of Mr. Hill and Mr. Green.
The Court held that the question of whether the NRTA provides that all Indigenous people have a right to hunt on unoccupied lands in Saskatchewan, regardless of their province of residence, is an important constitutional issue that will affect Indigenous people residing within and outside the province.
However, the Court held that it was unable to determine the issue based on the evidentiary record before it and ordered that a trial be held with additional historical evidence regarding the negotiation and purpose of the NRTA.
Why It Matters
The Court of Appeal decision affirms that the question of whether the hunting rights set out in the NRTA apply to all Indigenous people, or only those who hold rights under numbered treaties in Saskatchewan, is an issue of significant public importance which must be clarified by the courts.
Rather than resolving the issue, the decision in Green leaves Indigenous people seeking to hunt outside their province of residence in a legal grey area. The ongoing lack of clarity in the law has the potential to foment further uncertainty and conflict regarding Indigenous Peoples’ right to hunt, particularly in provinces which are already grappling with the effects of racism and the Crown’s ongoing failure to honour and uphold its treaty promises.
At the same time, the decision also opens the door for a more robust interpretation of Indigenous hunting rights which takes into account the historical and cultural circumstances which underlie the issues in the litigation. As the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed, constitutional issues cannot be determined in a vacuum. Based on the direction of the Court of Appeal, the eventual second trial decision in Green could result in a more meaningful understanding of Indigenous Peoples’ rights based on a full evidentiary record.
Looking Ahead
Too often, the rights of Indigenous Peoples have been determined by Canadian courts in the absence of a proper understanding of both the underlying historical facts and the perspectives of the Indigenous Peoples whose rights are at issue.
In some jurisdictions there are signs that this approach is shifting. In recent litigation in Ontario, for example, the Court heard extensive historical evidence as well as evidence from both Anishinaabe and Euro-Canadian witnesses, including experts, Elders and Chiefs, regarding the Crown’s obligations to increase annuity payments to the Indigenous beneficiaries of the Robinson Huron and Robinson Superior Treaties. The Court emphasized that the evidence of the Anishinaabe and Euro-Canadian perspectives were to be treated equally, and that evidence regarding the treaty parties’ understandings and intentions would not be discounted merely because it came from an unconventional source.
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Green suggests a similar shift may be at least partially underway in Saskatchewan. On the one hand, the Court’s emphasis on the need for historical evidence is an important step towards ensuring the interpretation of the NRTA is informed by the historical circumstances in which it was negotiated. At the same time, however, the Court fails to highlight the importance of including evidence regarding Indigenous Peoples’ understandings of the rights guaranteed pursuant to the numbered treaties and affirmed by the NRTA.
As a result, there is still a risk that the issues in Green will be decided without adequate consideration of the Indigenous perspective.
Going forward, it will be for both the parties and the trial judge to ensure that such evidence is included and given weight if the Green litigation is to both clarify the law and advance reconciliation.
First Peoples Law LLP is a law firm dedicated to defending and advancing the rights of Indigenous Peoples. We work exclusively with Indigenous Peoples to defend their inherent and constitutionally protected title, rights and Treaty rights, uphold their Indigenous laws and governance and ensure economic prosperity for their current and future generations.
Chat with us
Kate Gunn is partner at First Peoples Law LLP. Kate completed her Master's of Law at the University of British Columbia. Her most recent academic essay, "Agreeing to Share: Treaty 3, History & the Courts," was published in the UBC Law Review.
|
|
|
National news included child welfare, Idle No More, education and more
November 16 - 21, 2022 By Bruce McIvor and Geneva Lloyd |
AFN hasn't ruled out court challenge to tribunal's child welfare decision, regional chief says | CBC News
Proposed updates to child welfare legislation would require preservation of Indigenous identity | CBC News
How Indigenous institutes are reclaiming education | Maclean's Education
Legal advocacy group for First Nations people granted intervener status in Supreme Court case | CBC News
'Reactive' Indigenous Services failing to help First Nations manage emergencies, says auditor general | CBC News
Opinion: Six portraits of Indigenous resistance, from the Constitution Express to Idle No More
Métis and treaty rights topped Alberta headlines
Alberta First Nations leaders stand against premier’s sovereignty act | Global News
Constitution vote would allow Alberta Métis to self-govern; opponents feel under-consulted | Global News
BC headlines featured systemic racism and a decades-long fight for land
Status card report says First Nations people in B.C. feeling 'micro-aggressions' | APTN
25 years after the Delgamuukw case, the fight for land is more contentious than ever | CBC News
Water protection and sovereignty topped headlines in Manitoba
Indigenous guardians protect Manitoba’s last undammed river | The Narwhal
The Ring of Fire and Aboriginal title were back in the news in Ontario
Matawa chiefs push back against U.S. military agenda in the Ring of Fire - Northern Ontario Business
First Nations communities allowed to intervene in appeal raising Aboriginal issues: Ontario CA | Law Times
A ground-breaking First Nations water authority was in the spotlight on the east coast
Atlantic First Nations Water Authority signs deal to take over water services in 17 First Nations | CBC News
Duty to consult continues to top headlines in Saskatchewan
Kahkewistahaw First Nation says Mosaic has shirked duty to consult while operating potash mines in Sask. | CBC News
Nunavut news included a proposed mine expansion
Northern Affairs minister says no to Baffinland mine expansion | CBC News
Proposed updates to child welfare legislation would require preservation of Indigenous identity | CBC News
How Indigenous institutes are reclaiming education | Maclean's Education
Legal advocacy group for First Nations people granted intervener status in Supreme Court case | CBC News
'Reactive' Indigenous Services failing to help First Nations manage emergencies, says auditor general | CBC News
Opinion: Six portraits of Indigenous resistance, from the Constitution Express to Idle No More
Métis and treaty rights topped Alberta headlines
Alberta First Nations leaders stand against premier’s sovereignty act | Global News
Constitution vote would allow Alberta Métis to self-govern; opponents feel under-consulted | Global News
BC headlines featured systemic racism and a decades-long fight for land
Status card report says First Nations people in B.C. feeling 'micro-aggressions' | APTN
25 years after the Delgamuukw case, the fight for land is more contentious than ever | CBC News
Water protection and sovereignty topped headlines in Manitoba
Indigenous guardians protect Manitoba’s last undammed river | The Narwhal
The Ring of Fire and Aboriginal title were back in the news in Ontario
Matawa chiefs push back against U.S. military agenda in the Ring of Fire - Northern Ontario Business
First Nations communities allowed to intervene in appeal raising Aboriginal issues: Ontario CA | Law Times
A ground-breaking First Nations water authority was in the spotlight on the east coast
Atlantic First Nations Water Authority signs deal to take over water services in 17 First Nations | CBC News
Duty to consult continues to top headlines in Saskatchewan
Kahkewistahaw First Nation says Mosaic has shirked duty to consult while operating potash mines in Sask. | CBC News
Nunavut news included a proposed mine expansion
Northern Affairs minister says no to Baffinland mine expansion | CBC News
Reminder! TCVI is hosting a Youth Charity Golf Tournament at the St Paul Golf Course on Thursday, August 25, 2022
|
|
|
|
Opinion: The problem with labelling people ‘Pretendians’ - The Globe and Mail
The recent trend of labelling people who fraudulently claim to have Indigenous ancestry “Pretendians” has spawned a particularly toxic, divisive and insidious interpretation of what it means to be Indigenous. Problematically, it also distracts from the tireless work that Indigenous nations are doing to rebuild their own citizenship laws and decolonize how Indigenous citizenship decisions are made, and who makes them.
Indigenous leaders question intentions behind new public safety advisory group | CTV News
|
Alberta Justice is in the process of creating an Indigenous advisory group that will lend voice to policing matters, including on peace officers, victims' services, restorative justice and crime prevention. “I think it's a good concept and I support it in principle,” said Cameron Alexis, CEO for Tribal Chiefs Venture Inc. and adviser to Treaty 6 chiefs on police matters, “as long as it's not largely created because they're trying to find full support for their provincial police force organization in Alberta.” |
|
Alberta government news and statements February 17, 2022
A summary of news releases and statements issued today.
News
Investing in women’s success in IT
Alberta’s government will invest $1.9 million to support skills development training for women’s success in the IT sector.
Helping live music thrive in Alberta | Contribution à l'essor de la musique en direct en Alberta
The Stabilize Live Music Grant is helping hundreds of venues, musicians and other music professionals get back to recording and performing.
Marking a milestone with First Nation health partners
Immunization records for First Nation members are now reliably accessible in real time, marking an important step to help reduce preventable disease.
New renal dialysis unit opens in High Prairie
A new renal dialysis unit in High Prairie gives area residents greater access to specialized treatments closer to home.
Statements
Manufacturing growth in Alberta: Minister Schweitzer
Minister of Jobs, Economy and Innovation Doug Schweitzer issued the following statement about Alberta’s manufacturing sector.
Investing in women’s success in IT
Alberta’s government will invest $1.9 million to support skills development training for women’s success in the IT sector.
Helping live music thrive in Alberta | Contribution à l'essor de la musique en direct en Alberta
The Stabilize Live Music Grant is helping hundreds of venues, musicians and other music professionals get back to recording and performing.
Marking a milestone with First Nation health partners
Immunization records for First Nation members are now reliably accessible in real time, marking an important step to help reduce preventable disease.
New renal dialysis unit opens in High Prairie
A new renal dialysis unit in High Prairie gives area residents greater access to specialized treatments closer to home.
Statements
Manufacturing growth in Alberta: Minister Schweitzer
Minister of Jobs, Economy and Innovation Doug Schweitzer issued the following statement about Alberta’s manufacturing sector.
Hello:
I am pleased to share that recruitment is now underway for the new Minister’s Advisory Council on Higher Education and Skills (MACHES). Following the recent proclamation of Bill 74, the Advanced Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2021, MACHES can now be established.
The Ministry of Advanced Education is seeking applications from individuals who are interested in serving as the council chair or as a member. Informed by visionary thinking, stakeholder engagement, and global trends, this council will provide advice and recommendations to the Minister respecting:
Council chair and members will be appointments made through ministerial order for a term of up to three years. Please note that individuals are not eligible for appointment who are serving in the following capacities, or until after a period of at least one year has elapsed since serving as:
The posting, position profile, and application information are available online. Please direct any questions you may have to the contact provided on the Public Agency Secretariat website. Applications must be submitted by January 10, 2022.
We are committed to recruiting local, national, and international expertise, and we will therefore be advertising widely. Please join me in sharing this information with possible candidates who would make an excellent contribution. Together, we will transform Alberta’s post-secondary system to be more responsive to the needs of Albertans and our economy, ensuring current and future generations have the skills and knowledge they need to succeed.
I wish to thank all of you for your ongoing support of the Alberta 2030: Building Skills for Jobs strategy.
Best,
Demetrios Nicolaides
Minister of Advanced Education
I am pleased to share that recruitment is now underway for the new Minister’s Advisory Council on Higher Education and Skills (MACHES). Following the recent proclamation of Bill 74, the Advanced Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2021, MACHES can now be established.
The Ministry of Advanced Education is seeking applications from individuals who are interested in serving as the council chair or as a member. Informed by visionary thinking, stakeholder engagement, and global trends, this council will provide advice and recommendations to the Minister respecting:
- the strategic goals and direction of post-secondary education in Alberta;
- metrics for measuring the performance of public post-secondary institutions and independent academic institutions in Alberta; and
- any other matters, as required.
Council chair and members will be appointments made through ministerial order for a term of up to three years. Please note that individuals are not eligible for appointment who are serving in the following capacities, or until after a period of at least one year has elapsed since serving as:
- a member of a board of a public post-secondary institution or of a board of a private post-secondary institution;
- a president or vice-president of a public post-secondary institution or of a private post-secondary institution; or
- an officer or voting member of the executive body of:
- an academic staff association,
- a non-academic staff association,
- a student organization, or
- a bargaining agent representing the employees of a public post-secondary institution or of a private post-secondary institution.
The posting, position profile, and application information are available online. Please direct any questions you may have to the contact provided on the Public Agency Secretariat website. Applications must be submitted by January 10, 2022.
We are committed to recruiting local, national, and international expertise, and we will therefore be advertising widely. Please join me in sharing this information with possible candidates who would make an excellent contribution. Together, we will transform Alberta’s post-secondary system to be more responsive to the needs of Albertans and our economy, ensuring current and future generations have the skills and knowledge they need to succeed.
I wish to thank all of you for your ongoing support of the Alberta 2030: Building Skills for Jobs strategy.
Best,
Demetrios Nicolaides
Minister of Advanced Education
Agreement aims to train more Indigenous physicians, improve health care for six northeastern Alberta First Nations
|
Six northeastern Alberta First Nations have formed a new partnership with the University of Alberta with the aim of training more Indigenous physicians and improving health care for their members.
The memorandum of relational understanding between the university and Tribal Chiefs Ventures Inc., which represents Beaver Lake Cree Nation, Cold Lake First Nation, Frog Lake First Nation, Heart Lake First Nation, Kehewin Cree Nation, and Whitefish Lake First Nation No. 128, was signed today during a virtual ceremony |
Historic memorandum of relational understanding signed between University of Alberta and Tribal Chiefs Ventures Inc.
|
DOORS OPEN TO NEW INDIGENOUS HOUSING IN EDMONTON
|
|
|
BILL 64 2021 PUBLIC LANDS AMENDMENT ACT
Alberta and Ottawa put $13M into Indigenous housing projects across the province
70 affordable housing units will be designed, delivered and owned by Indigenous peoples
Natalie Valleau · CBC News ·
Cameron Alexis, the CEO of Tribal Chiefs Ventures, pictured above, says the project will help Indigenous people find affordable homes. (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation)
The provincial and federal governments are committing $13.1 million for Indigenous housing projects in several cities and towns across Alberta.
In Edmonton, a 34-unit building will be purchased for Indigenous affordable housing. While in Calgary, Lac Ste. Anne and Victor Lake, Alta., which is near Grande Cache, 36 senior housing units will be built.
The province says all of the affordable housing units will be designed, delivered and owned by Indigenous peoples.
"This means that over 100 Indigenous families across the province of Alberta will have a new place to call home," said Ahmed Hussen, the Minister responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).
"We're committed to addressing the barriers faced by Indigenous communities every single day and it starts [with] ensuring that the solutions for the community are provided by the community."
He adds that the project will create around 100 jobs.
"Our targeted investment will not only stimulate the economy and create well-paying jobs where they are needed the most, they will also ensure the needs of Indigenous families … are met," he said.
Cameron Alexis, the CEO of Tribal Chiefs Ventures, says this initiative will help Indigenous people find alternate housing solutions.
"Just recently we visited the downtown core of Edmonton and it is really painful to see our people on the streets. When we saw that, our chiefs signalled that we have to do something," he said.
"Collectively, we worked hard with the respective governments to do our part."
Alexis says the project is just the "beginning."
In Edmonton, a 34-unit building will be purchased for Indigenous affordable housing. While in Calgary, Lac Ste. Anne and Victor Lake, Alta., which is near Grande Cache, 36 senior housing units will be built.
The province says all of the affordable housing units will be designed, delivered and owned by Indigenous peoples.
"This means that over 100 Indigenous families across the province of Alberta will have a new place to call home," said Ahmed Hussen, the Minister responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).
"We're committed to addressing the barriers faced by Indigenous communities every single day and it starts [with] ensuring that the solutions for the community are provided by the community."
He adds that the project will create around 100 jobs.
"Our targeted investment will not only stimulate the economy and create well-paying jobs where they are needed the most, they will also ensure the needs of Indigenous families … are met," he said.
Cameron Alexis, the CEO of Tribal Chiefs Ventures, says this initiative will help Indigenous people find alternate housing solutions.
"Just recently we visited the downtown core of Edmonton and it is really painful to see our people on the streets. When we saw that, our chiefs signalled that we have to do something," he said.
"Collectively, we worked hard with the respective governments to do our part."
Alexis says the project is just the "beginning."
Funding for Indigenous-owned housing projects.
CONFEDERACY OF TREATY No. 6 FIRST NATIONS WELCOME NEW GRAND CHIEF OKIMAW VERNON WATCHMAKER
Treaty No. 6 Territory – January 7, 2021
The Confederacy of Treaty No. 6 First Nations have appointed Okimaw (Chief) Vernon Watchmaker of Kehewin Cree Nation as the next Grand Chief of the Confederacy, succeeding Chief Billy Morin. Watchmaker will continue the many successes under Chief Morin including his urban initiative, as well as, build upon the Protocol with the Province of Alberta.
“The First Nations of Treaty No. 6 should be included in resource development so that our youth can gain meaningful employment and ensure prosperity for future generations.” said Okimaw Vernon Watchmaker. “When First Nations are at the table, we can ensure that development occurs respectfully with protections for our traditional lands and waters.”
“Okimaw Watchmaker brings a wealth of experience and education. We look forward to working with him and ensuring that our shared visions are realized.” said Okimaw Greg Desjarlais, Chief of the Frog Lake First Nation.
Throughout his career, Watchmaker has been Okimaw of the Kehewin Cree Nation and Council member. He has also worked as an analyst, technician and project lead for lands and resources, economic development, education, and the energy sector. He worked as a technician for the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations, in lands and consultation. He served as a member of student council at the University of Alberta, and board member at the Bonnyville Friendship Centre. Having a keen interest in youth development, he has coached and organized several youth sports and recreational activities. Okimaw lives in Kehewin with his wife and has eight children and one grandchild.
The Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations was created in the Spring of 1993 with the purpose of serving as the United political voice for those Treaty Nations who are signatories of Treaty No. 6 for the continued protection of the fundamental Treaty, Inherent and Human Rights of the Treaty peoples of those Nations.
The Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations is dedicated to ensuring that the terms, spirit and intent of Treaty No. 6 are honored and respected. The inherent rights of the Treaty No. 6 First Nations must be honoured and respected.
|
|
Spotlight on the Post COVID Indigenous Economy
Featured
Information coming soon.
Related links
Archived Stories
Covid-19
Events
Jobs
Date modified:
2021-06-28
2021-06-28
